...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Management and Research >Risk Factors and Clavien–Dindo Classification of Postoperative Complications After Laparoscopic and Open Gastrectomies for Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center, Large Sample, Retrospective Cohort Study
【24h】

Risk Factors and Clavien–Dindo Classification of Postoperative Complications After Laparoscopic and Open Gastrectomies for Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center, Large Sample, Retrospective Cohort Study

机译:腹腔镜和开放胃癌患者术后并发症的危险因素和克拉夫 - DINDO分类:单中心,大型样本,回顾队列研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background:Laparoscopy has been increasingly used for the surgery of gastric cancer. However, the postoperative complications are still under-investigated and the short-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy remain controversial. This study aimed to explore the differences of postoperative complications between laparoscopic and open radical gastrectomies in patients with gastric cancer through the large sample size, retrospective cohort study, and evaluate the safety of laparoscopy in patients who underwent radical gastrectomy.Patients and Methods:A total of 2,966 patients with gastric cancer (TNM I~III) who underwent laparoscopy or open gastrectomy from February 2009 to March 2016 were enrolled in this study. Complications were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The incidence and severity of complications between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy were compared using one-to-three propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors related to postoperative complications.Results:A total of 2,966 patients were included in the study, including 687 (23.2%) in the LG (Laparoscopy gastrectomies) group and 2,279 (76.8%) in the OG (open gastrectomies) group. After PSM, a well-balanced cohort of 2,373 patients (676 cases in the LG group and 1,697 cases in the OG group) was further analyzed. The results showed that the incidence of overall complications in the LG group was significantly less than the OG group (15.4% vs 20.8%, P=0.003). However, the severe complications of the LG group showed no difference towards the OG group (5.8% vs 5.8%, P=0.952). Multivariate analysis revealed that laparoscopic surgery is a protective factor for the reduction of postoperative complications. Age ≥60 years, ASA classification IIIc and estimated blood loss ≥200 mL were confirmed as independent risk factors of overall complications.Conclusion:Compared with traditional open gastrectomy, LG is safe and feasible with less trauma and fewer complications for patients with gastric cancer.? 2020 Lian et al.
机译:背景:腹腔镜检查越来越多地用于胃癌的手术。然而,术后并发症仍在研究过,腹腔镜胃切除术的短期结果仍然存在争议。本研究旨在探讨腹腔镜和胃癌患者腹腔镜和开放性激进胃切除术的差异,通过大型样品大小,回顾队列研究,评价腹腔镜检查的腹腔镜检查,患者进行自由基胃癌。患者和方法:总共2,966例胃癌(TNM I〜III)患者于2009年2月至2016年3月从2009年2月到2016年3月接受腹腔镜或开放的胃切除术患者进行了纳入本研究。并发症根据Clavien-Dindo分类分类。使用一对三个倾态得分匹配(PSM)分析,比较腹腔镜和开放胃切除术之间并发症的发病率和严重程度。进行逻辑回归分析以识别与术后并发症相关的风险因素。研究结果:研究中共有2,966名患者,其中LG(腹腔镜检查胃切除术)组687(23.2%)和OG中的2,279(76.8%) (开放胃切除术)组。 PSM后,进一步分析了2,373名患者的均衡队列(LG组676例,og组中的1,697例)。结果表明,LG组总体并发症的发病率明显小于OG组(15.4%vs 20.8%,p = 0.003)。然而,LG组的严重并发症对OG组没有差异(5.8%Vs 5.8%,P = 0.952)。多变量分析显示,腹腔镜手术是减少术后并发症的保护因素。年龄≥60岁,ASA分类IIIC和估计的血液损失≥200mL被证实为整体并发症的独立危险因素。结论:与传统开放胃切除术相比,LG与胃癌患者的创伤较少和更少的并发症相比。还是2020 Lian等人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号