...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Management and Research >The Effect of Low and High Vacuum Drainage on the Postoperative Drainage of Breast Cancer: Insights from a Prospective, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial
【24h】

The Effect of Low and High Vacuum Drainage on the Postoperative Drainage of Breast Cancer: Insights from a Prospective, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:低真空引流对乳腺癌术后引流的影响:从前瞻性,非劣种,随机临床试验中的见解

获取原文

摘要

Background:Vacuum drains have been extensively applied to prevent seroma formation after breast surgery. However, the usage of negative suction drainage is mainly determined by surgeon's experience and preferences. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the drain effect after breast surgery between the low and high vacuum drains.Methods:This prospectively randomized trial (from January 2018 to June 2019) involved 188 patients who were subjected to modified radical mastectomy (group A, n=128) or immediate breast reconstruction with implants (group B, n=60). In each group, patients were randomized to receive high vacuum drain (pressure=-98 kPa) or low vacuum drain (pressure=-12 kPa) after surgery. Days of drain permanence, which means the duration of drainage, was the primary endpoint.Results:According to the comparison of days of drain permanence, the effect of a low vacuum drain is not inferior to a high vacuum drain in group A (pectoral drain, P0.001; axillary drain, P0.001) or group B (submuscular drain, P=0.002). The complications frequently occurred on patients with high vacuum drain (11.7%), such as seroma formation. The expense of low vacuum drain was significantly lower than high vacuum drain in both groups (P0.01).Conclusion:The drain effect of the low vacuum drain is not inferior to a high vacuum drain in both group A and group B. The low vacuum drain was effective, relatively cheap, and did not increase the incidence of complications; it is therefore more recommended after breast surgery.? 2020 Lin et al.
机译:背景:吸尘器已被广泛应用于防止乳房手术后血清瘤形成。然而,消极吸引排水的使用主要由外科医生的经验和偏好决定。本研究的目的是潜在比较低真空漏斗和高真空漏斗之间的乳房手术后的排水效应。方法:这项前瞻性随机试验(2018年1月至2019年6月)涉及188名患有改性的根治性乳房切除术的患者(A组,n = 128)或用植入物直接乳房重建(B组,n = 60)。在每组中,患者被随机化以在手术后接受高真空漏极(压力= -98kPa)或低真空漏极(压力= -12kPa)。排水持续的日子,这意味着排水的持续时间,是主要终点。结果:根据排水持续天数的比较,低真空漏极的效果不低于A组(胸排水)的高真空漏极,p <0.001;腋生漏极,p <0.001)或B组(含膜排水,p = 0.002)。高真空排水管(11.7%)的患者经常发生并发症,例如血清瘤形成。在两个组中,低真空漏极的费用显着低于高真空漏极(P <0.01)。结论:低真空漏极的排水效应不低于A组和B组中的高真空流失。低真空流失有效,相对便宜,并且没有增加并发症的发生率;因此,乳房手术后更多地推荐。 2020 Lin等人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号