首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Cell International >Prediction of the VeriStrat test in first-line therapy of pemetrexed-based regimens for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients
【24h】

Prediction of the VeriStrat test in first-line therapy of pemetrexed-based regimens for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients

机译:先进肺腺癌患者培育术术治疗术前术治疗术中veristrat试验的预测

获取原文
           

摘要

Although advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have significantly better survival outcomes after pemetrexed based treatment, a subset of patients still show intrinsic resistance and progress rapidly. Therefore we aimed to use a blood-based protein signature (VeriStrat, VS) to analyze whether VS could identify the subset of patients who had poor efficacy on pemetrexed therapy. This study retrospectively analysed 72 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who received first-line pemetrexed/platinum or combined with bevacizumab treatment. Plasma samples from these patients were analysed using VS and classified into the Good (VS-G) or Poor (VS-P) group. The relationship between efficacy and VS status was further investigated. Of the 72 patients included in this study, 35 (48.6%) were treated with pemetrexed plus platinum and 37 (51.4%) were treated with pemetrexed/platinum combined with bevacizumab. Among all patients, 60 (83.3%) and 12 (16.7%) patients were classified as VS-G and VS-P, respectively. VS-G patients had significantly better median progression-free survival (PFS) (Unreached vs. 4.2 months; P??0.001) than VS-P patients. In addition, the partial response (PR) rate was higher in the VS-G group than that in the VS-P group (46.7% vs. 25.0%, P?=?0.212). Subgroup analysis showed that PFS was also significantly longer in the VS-G group than that in the VS-P group regardless of whether patients received chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Our study indicated that VS might be considered as a novel and valid method to predict the efficacy of pemetrexed-based therapy and identify a subset of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who had intrinsic resistance to pemetrexed based regimens. However, larger sample studies are still needed to further confirm this result.
机译:虽然先进的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在基于培养基的治疗后具有明显更好的存活结果,但患者的子集仍然表现出内在的抵抗力和进展。因此,我们的目标是使用血液型蛋白质签名(Veristrat,VS)来分析VS是否可以识别对培养基治疗效果差的患者的子集。本研究回顾性地分析了72名高级肺腺癌患者,接受了一线培养基/铂或与Bevacizumab治疗结合。使用VS分析来自这些患者的血浆样品,并分为良好(VS-G)或差(VS-P)组。进一步调查了有效性与VS状态之间的关系。在本研究中包含的72名患者中,用Pemetrexed Plus铂处理35(48.6%),用戊酰度/铂与Bevacizumab合并37(51.4%)。在所有患者中,60例(83.3%)和12名(16.7%)患者分别分别为VS-G和VS-P。 VS-G患者具有更好的中位进展生存(PFS)(未与0.42个月; P?<0.001),而不是VS-P患者。此外,VS-G组的部分反应(PR)速率高于VS-P组(46.7%与25.0%,P≤0.212)。亚组分析表明,无论患者是否接受单独接受化疗,PFS在VS-G组中也显着更长。单独接受化疗或化疗加贝伐单抗。我们的研究表明,VS可能被视为一种新的和有效的方法,以预测基于培养基的治疗的疗效,并确定具有基于培养基的内在抗性的肺腺癌患者的晚期肺腺癌患者的疗效。但是,仍然需要更大的样本研究来进一步证实这一结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号