...
首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences Discussions >Forests, savannas, and grasslands: bridging the knowledge gap between ecology and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models
【24h】

Forests, savannas, and grasslands: bridging the knowledge gap between ecology and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models

机译:森林,大草原和草原:弥合生态和动态全球植被模型之间的知识差距

获取原文
           

摘要

The forest, savanna, and grassland biomes, and the transitions between them, are expected to undergo major changes in the future due to global climate change. Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) are very useful for understanding vegetation dynamics under the present climate, and for predicting its changes under future conditions. However, several DGVMs display high uncertainty in predicting vegetation in tropical areas. Here we perform a comparative analysis of three different DGVMs (JSBACH, LPJ-GUESS-SPITFIRE and aDGVM) with regard to their representation of the ecological mechanisms and feedbacks that determine the forest, savanna, and grassland biomes, in an attempt to bridge the knowledge gap between ecology and global modeling. The outcomes of the models, which include different mechanisms, are compared to observed tree cover along a mean annual precipitation gradient in Africa. By drawing on the large number of recent studies that have delivered new insights into the ecology of tropical ecosystems in general, and of savannas in particular, we identify two main mechanisms that need improved representation in the examined DGVMs. The first mechanism includes water limitation to tree growth, and tree–grass competition for water, which are key factors in determining savanna presence in arid and semi-arid areas. The second is a grass–fire feedback, which maintains both forest and savanna presence in mesic areas. Grasses constitute the majority of the fuel load, and at the same time benefit from the openness of the landscape after fires, since they recover faster than trees. Additionally, these two mechanisms are better represented when the models also include tree life stages (adults and seedlings), and distinguish between fire-prone and shade-tolerant forest trees, and fire-resistant and shade-intolerant savanna trees. Including these basic elements could improve the predictive ability of the DGVMs, not only under current climate conditions but also and especially under future scenarios.
机译:森林,大草原和草原生物群体以及它们之间的过渡预计由于全球气候变化,将来的未来发生重大变化。动态全球植被模型(DGVM)非常有用,对于理解当前气候下的植被动态,以及预测其在未来条件下的变化。然而,几个DGVMS在热带地区预测植被时显示出高的不确定性。在这里,我们对三种不同的DGVM(JSBACH,LPJ-GUSP-SPITFIRE和ADGVM)的比较分析,了解森林,大草原和草原生物群体的生态机制和反馈的代表,试图弥合知识生态与全球建模之间的差距。将包括不同机制的模型的结果与非洲平均年降水梯度观察到的树木覆盖。通过借鉴了大量最近的研究,一般都提供了新的见解热带生态系统的生态,尤其是热带草原,我们确定需要在检查DGVMs改进的表示两种主要机制。第一种机制包括对树木生长的水限制,以及水的树草竞争,这是在干旱和半干旱地区确定大草原存在的关键因素。第二个是草地火灾反馈,它在浅滩地区维持森林和大草原。草地构成了大部分燃料负荷,同时从火灾后的景观开放中受益,因为它们恢复得比树更快。另外,为更好的体现这两种机制当模特还包括树的生命阶段(成人和苗),以及火灾多发和耐荫林木分清,耐火和色调不耐受的稀树草原的树木。包括这些基本要素可以改善DGVM的预测能力,不仅在当前的气候条件下,而且特别是在未来的情况下。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号