...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology >Comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal - epidural anesthesia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparison of three sitting positions for combined spinal - epidural anesthesia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

机译:三个坐着脊柱硬膜外麻醉三个坐姿的比较:多中心随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and objectivesThe aim of this prospective, multi-centered and multi-arm parallel randomized trial was to test the hypothesis that modified sitting positions including hamstring stretch position (HSP) and squatting position (SP) would reduce needle - bone contact events and increase the success rate of combined spinal - epidural anesthesia (CSEA) compared to traditional sitting position (TSP) in patients undergoing total knee or hip arthroplasty.Patients and methodsThree hundred and sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients, aged between 45-85 years were randomly allocated to one of three groups using computer-generated simple randomization: group TSP (n?=?120), group HSP (n?=?120), and group SP (n?=?120). Primary outcome measures were the number of needle-bone contact and success rates. Secondary outcome measure was the ease of interspinous space identification.ResultsSeven patients in group SP and four of HSP could not tolerate their position and were excluded. Number of needle-bone contact, success rates, and grade of interspinous space identification were similar between groups (p?=?1.000). Independent of positioning, the success rates were higher in patients whose interspinous space was graded as easy compared to difficult or impossible (p?
机译:背景和ObjectiveSthe目的是这一前瞻性,多臂和多臂并联试验的目的是测试修改后的坐姿(HSP)和蹲位置(SP)的修正坐姿(SP)将减少针对骨接触事件并增加与传统的膝关节或髋关节成形术患者相比,组合脊柱硬膜外麻醉(CSEA)的成功率(CSEA)与传统坐姿(TSP)相比,患有膝关节或髋关节置换术患者养分和六十六十六十六年的麻醉学士(ASA)I-III患者,年龄在45-使用计算机生成的简单随机化将85年随机分配给三组中的一个:组TSP(n?=Δ120),组HSP(n?=?120),组SP(n?=?120)。主要结果措施是针对尖骨接触和成功率的数量。次要结果措施是易于卷入的空间鉴定。SP组和四个HSP中的患者不能容忍他们的立场并被排除在外。尖骨接触的数量,成功率和灰度空间鉴定的等级相似(P?= 1.000)。与定位无关,与困难或不可能相比,血液空间的患者的患者成功率较高(P?<0.001)。成功率降低,灰白色的空间鉴定变得更具挑战性,并且随着患者的体重指数(BMI)增加(P?<0.001)。CONCLUSIONSP和HSP可以用作TSP的替代品,而尖骨接触数增加。 BMI和易于禁闭的空间鉴定可能被认为是CSEA成功的重要决定因素。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号