...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Dental Journal >Color Stability of Ceramic Veneers Luted With Resin Cements and Pre-Heated Composites: 12 Months Follow-Up
【24h】

Color Stability of Ceramic Veneers Luted With Resin Cements and Pre-Heated Composites: 12 Months Follow-Up

机译:陶瓷贴面的颜色稳定性用树脂水泥和预热复合材料:12个月随访

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective was to evaluate the color stability of ceramic veneers luted with resincements and pre-heated composite resins (60 oC) for 12 months, and determine the degreeof conversion (DC) of the luting agents. Two resin cements (AllCem Veneer, light-cured(LRC) and AllCem, dual-cured (DRC)] and three composite resins [Z100 (MNCR–minifilled),Herculite Classic (MHCR–micro-hybrid) and Durafill (MCCR–microfilled)] were used forcementing 0.8-mm-thick lithium-silicate glass-ceramic laminates (Suprinity, shade B2-HT, Vita) on bovine enamel (n=10). The specimens were stored at 37 oC in distilled water.CIELab parameters were determined at 24h after luting (baseline), 7, 30, 90, 180 days and12 months. Three specimens were prepared for DC evaluation, performed by micro-Ramanspectroscopy. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=5%). For ΔEab and ΔE00,there were significant differences for luting material (p0.001), time (p0.001), and doubleinteraction (p0.001). The groups cemented with MHCR (1 year), MCCR (90 days and 1year) and MCCR-PH (1 year) were the ones with ΔE values greater than the acceptabilitythreshold. All other groups maintained their ΔE lower than the acceptability threshold after1 year in distilled water. Regarding DC, there were no significant differences (p=0.127)among the materials. Non-significant negative correlations were observed between themean ΔEab and DC (R=-0.65) and ΔE00 and DC (R=-0.64). A significant positive correlationwas observed mean ΔEab and ΔE00 (R=0.99). It was concluded that the different lutingagents influenced the final color of the restorations. The heating of the composite resinsdid not affect their DC.
机译:目的是评估用重新分裂和预热复合树脂(60℃)的陶瓷贴面的颜色稳定性12个月,并确定Luting试剂的转化率(DC)。两种树脂水泥(ALLCEM胶合剂,光固化(LRC)和ALLCEM,双固化(DRC)]和三种复合树脂[Z100(MNCR-MINIFIFIIFIBED),Herculite Classic(MHCR-Micro-Hybrid)和Durafill(MCCR-Microfilled) )]使用牛釉质的0.8mm厚的锂 - 硅酸锂玻璃 - 陶瓷层压板(n静脉,遮阳B2-HT,VITA)。试样在蒸馏水中储存在37℃。Cielab参数在LUTING(基线),7,30,90,180天和12个月后在24小时内确定。制备三种样品进行DC评估,通过微ramanspectroscopy进行。通过ANOVA和Tukey的测试分析数据(α= 5%)。对于ΔEAb和Δe00,延伸材料(p <0.001),时间(p <0.001)和双互动存在显着差异(P <0.001)。群体用MHCR(1年),MCCR(90天和1年)粘合MCCR-pH(1年)是ΔE值大于可接受性的ΔE值。所有其他组保持ΔE低于可接受性阈值1年蒸馏水。关于DC,材料中没有显着差异(p = 0.127)。在主题ΔEAB和DC(R = -0.65)和ΔE00和DC(R = -0.64)之间观察非显着的负相关。观察到的显着的正相关性是平均ΔEAb和Δe00(r = 0.99)。结论是,不同的Lutingagents影响了修复的最终颜色。复合材料的加热不影响其DC。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号