首页> 外文期刊>Brain and Behavior >Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the Maudsley Staging Model
【24h】

Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the Maudsley Staging Model

机译:毛泽东分期模型“耐治疗”抑郁症患者电耦合治疗的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for patients with mood disorders and is most often used for treatment‐resistant cases. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of ECT in a real‐world treatment sample in a Chinese psychiatric hospital which included both treatment‐resistant and nontreatment‐resistant patients. Methods An observational study of symptom outcomes from admission to the time of discharge was conducted with 37 inpatients diagnosed with unipolar or bipolar depression treated with ECT. Symptom severity was assessed with the 17‐item Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression (HRSD‐17) and treatment‐resistance with the Maudsley Staging Model (MSM). Stratifying at the MSM median admission characteristics and symptom change was compared between patients who were treatment‐resistant (n?=?18) and who were not (n?=?19). The outcome difference between groups was compared using analyses of covariance adjusted for baseline characteristics including symptom severity, followed by linear regression to identify factors associated symptom improvement in the entire sample. Results The sample (n?=?37) showed moderate treatment‐resistance (MSM?=?7.30?±?1.13) at admission and both groups received 8.3?±?2 ECT sessions. The treatment‐resistant group had a smaller proportion of bipolar patients and more severe symptoms, but showed no significant difference from the nontreatment‐resistant group in HDRS‐17 scores at the time of discharge (adjusted means?=?6.23?±?1.00 vs. 5.94?±?0.97, Partial η2?=?0.001, p?=?.845). Baseline symptom severity was the strongest correlate of reduction in HDRS‐17 scores (β?=?0.891, p??.001). Conclusions Symptom change with ECT in depression did not differ by level of treatment‐resistance but was greatest among those with more severe baseline symptoms. Correlates of ECT effectiveness should be further evaluated in stratified randomized trials.
机译:介绍电耦合治疗(ECT)是对情绪障碍患者的有效治疗方法,最常用于耐治疗案件。本研究旨在探讨ECT在中国精神病院中的真实治疗样品中的效果,包括耐治疗和抗性抗性患者。方法采用入院症状结果对放电时间的症状结果进行了观察研究,用37例诊断出用ECT处理的单极或双极性抑郁症进行。用17项Hamilton评级尺度评估症状严重程度,用于抑郁症(HRSD-17)和与Maudsley分期模型(MSM)的处理抵抗力。在抗治疗(n?= 18)的患者之间比较了MSM中位入院特征和症状变化的分层,谁没有(n?=?19)。使用调整的基线特征的协方差分析进行比较组之间的结果差异,包括症状严重程度,然后线性回归鉴定了整个样本中相关症状改善的因素。结果样品(n≤=α37)显示在入院的中等静态耐药性(MSM?= 7.30?±7.30±1.13),并且两个组收到8.3?±2 ECT会话。抗治疗组具有较小的双极患者和更严重的症状比例较小,但表现出在放电时在HDRS-17分数中的非抗病组中没有显着差异(调整的手段?=Δ6.23?±?1.00 VS 。5.94?±0.97,部分η2?=?0.001,p?= ?. 845)。基线症状严重程度是HDRS-17分数的最强相关性(β?= 0.891,P?<001)。结论抑郁症症状变化与抑郁水平没有差异的抗性水平,但在具有更严重的基线症状的人中最大。应在分层随机试验中进一步评估ECT效果的相关性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号