首页> 外文期刊>Brain and Behavior >Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke
【24h】

Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke

机译:机器学习是一种有效的方法,用于预测急性缺血性卒中后的预孢子率延迟

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives This study aimed to identify the influencing factors associated with long onset‐to‐door time and establish predictive models that could help to assess the probability of prehospital delay in populations with a high risk for stroke. Materials and Methods Patients who were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hospitalized between 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2019 were interviewed, and their medical records were extracted for data analysis. Two machine learning algorithms (support vector machine and Bayesian network) were applied in this study, and their predictive performance was compared with that of the classical logistic regression models after using several variable selection methods. Timely admission (onset‐to‐door time??3?hr) and prehospital delay (onset‐to‐door time?≥?3?hr) were the outcome variables. We computed the area under curve (AUC) and the difference in the mean AUC values between the models. Results A total of 450 patients with AIS were enrolled; 57 (12.7%) with timely admission and 393 (87.3%) patients with prehospital delay. All models, both those constructed by logistic regression and those by machine learning, performed well in predicting prehospital delay (range mean AUC: 0.800–0.846). The difference in the mean AUC values between the best performing machine learning model and the best performing logistic regression model was negligible (0.014; 95% CI: 0.013–0.015). Conclusions Machine learning algorithms were not inferior to logistic regression models for prediction of prehospital delay after stroke. All models provided good discrimination, thereby creating valuable diagnostic programs for prehospital delay prediction.
机译:本研究的目标旨在确定与长期入门时间的影响因素,并建立预测模型,可以有助于评估中风风险高风险的群体的预孢子延迟概率。采访了患有急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)和2019年7月31日至2019年7月31日至2019年7月31日的患者的材料和方法进行了采访,并提取了他们的医疗记录进行数据分析。本研究应用了两台机器学习算法(支持向量机和贝叶斯网络),并将其预测性能与经典逻辑回归模型的预测性能进行了比较,在使用几种可变选择方法之后。及时入场(开始到门时间?<?3?HR)和预孢子延迟(入门到门时间?≥?3?HR)是结果变量。我们计算了曲线(AUC)下的区域和模型之间平均AUC值的差异。结果共有450例AI患者; 57(12.7%)及时入场,393名(87.3%)患者的预孢子率延迟。所有型号,都是由Logistic回归和通过机器学习构成的型号,在预测预测延迟时表现良好(范围平均AUC:0.800-0.846)。最佳执行机器学习模型与最佳性能逻辑回归模型之间的平均AUC值的差异可忽略不计(0.014; 95%CI:0.013-0.015)。结论机器学习算法不逊于挥发性回归模型,以预测行程后的预孢子延迟。所有型号都提供了良好的歧视,从而为预孢子延迟预测创造了有价值的诊断程序。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号