...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC proceedings. >Comparison of multiple single-nucleotide variant association tests in a meta-analysis of Genetic Analysis Workshop 19 family and unrelated data
【24h】

Comparison of multiple single-nucleotide variant association tests in a meta-analysis of Genetic Analysis Workshop 19 family and unrelated data

机译:遗传分析研讨会19个家庭和无关数据的遗传分析荟萃分析中多种单核苷酸变异缔合测试的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Meta-analysis has been widely used in genetic association studies to increase sample size and to improve power, both in the context of single-variant analysis, as well as for gene-based tests. Meta-analysis approaches for haplotype analysis have not been extensively developed and used, and have not been compared with other ways of jointly analysing multiple genetic variants. We propose a novel meta-analysis approach for a gene-based haplotype association test, and compare it with an existing meta-analysis approach of the sequence kernel association test (SKAT), using the unrelated samples and family samples of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 19 data sets. We performed association tests with diastolic blood pressure and restricted our analyses to all variants in exonic regions on all odd chromosomes. Meta-analysis of haplotype results and SKAT identified different genes. The most significantly associated gene identified by SKAT was the ALCAM gene on chromosome 3 with a p value of 7.0?×?10(-?5). Two of the most associated genes identified by the haplotype method were FPGT (p?=?6.7?×?10(-?8)) on chromosome 1 and SPARC (p?=?3.3?×?10(-?7)) on chromosome 5. Both genes were previously implicated in blood pressure regulation and hypertension. We compared two meta-analysis approaches to jointly analyze multiple variants: SKAT and haplotype tests. The difference in observed results may be because the haplotype method considered all observed haplotypes, whereas SKAT weighted variants inversely to their minor allele frequency, masking the effects of common variants. The two approaches identified different top genes, and appear to be complementary.
机译:Meta分析已广泛用于遗传关联研究,以增加样品尺寸并在单变分析的背景下提高功率,以及基于基因的测试。单倍型分析的荟萃分析方法尚未广泛开发和使用,并且尚未与其他方式进行比较,并与联合分析多种遗传变异。我们提出了一种新的Meta分析方法,用于基于基于基因的单倍型关联测试,并将其与序列核关联测试(SKAT)的现有元分析方法进行比较,使用遗传分析研讨会19的无关样本和家庭样本数据集。我们对舒张压进行了协会测试,并限制了我们对所有奇染色体上的偏振区域中的所有变体的分析。荟萃分析单倍型结果和SKAT鉴定了不同的基因。 Skat鉴定的最显着相关的基因是染色体3上的Alcam基因,P值为7.0×10( - - β5)。通过单倍型方法鉴定的两种最相关的基因是FPGT(P?=α.6.7?×10( - - β))在染色体1和SPARC(P?= 3.3?×10( - '7))在染色体5中。这两个基因先前均涉及血压调节和高血压。我们比较了两种荟萃分析方法,共同分析了多种变体:Skat和单倍型测试。观察结果的差异可能是因为单倍型方法被认为是所有观察到的单倍型,而SKAT加权变体反向其次要等位基因频率,掩盖常用变体的影响。这两种方法鉴定了不同的顶部基因,似乎是互补的。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号