...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Cost-effectiveness evidence for strategies to promote or support breastfeeding: a systematic search and narrative literature review
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness evidence for strategies to promote or support breastfeeding: a systematic search and narrative literature review

机译:促进或支持母乳喂养的战略的成本效益证据:系统的搜索和叙事文献综述

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Global health policy recommends exclusive breastfeeding until infants are 6?months. Little is known about the cost-effectiveness of breastfeeding promotion strategies. This paper presents a systematic search and narrative review of economic evaluations of strategies to support or promote breastfeeding. The aim of the review is to bring together current knowledge to guide researchers and commissioners towards potentially cost-effective strategies to promote or support breastfeeding. Searches were conducted of electronic databases, including MEDLINE and Scopus, for economic evaluations relevant to breastfeeding, published up to August 2019. Records were screened against pre-specified inclusion/exclusion criteria and quality was assessed using a published checklist. Costs reported in included studies underwent currency conversion and inflation to a single year and currency so that they could be compared. The review protocol was registered on the PROSPERO register of literature reviews (ID, CRD42019141721). There were 212 non-duplicate citations. Four were included in the review, which generally indicated that interventions were cost-effective. Two studies reported that breastfeeding promotion for low-birth weight babies in critical care is associated with lower costs and greater health benefits than usual care and so is likely to be cost-effective. Peer-support for breastfeeding was associated with longer duration of exclusivity with costs ranging from £19–£107 per additional month (two studies). There is limited published evidence on the cost-effectiveness of strategies to promote breastfeeding, although the quality of the current evidence is reasonably high. Future studies should integrate evaluations of the effectiveness of strategies with economic analyses.
机译:全球卫生政策建议在婴儿6?几个月之前推荐专属母乳喂养。关于母乳喂养促进策略的成本效益少。本文提出了对支持或促进母乳喂养的战略的经济评估系统的系统搜索和叙述审查。审查的目的是汇集当前的知识,以指导研究人员和专员对促进或支持母乳喂养的潜在经济效益的策略。在2019年8月发布的与母乳喂养有关的经济评估,包括Medline和Scopus的电子数据库,包括Medline和Scopus的搜索。根据预先规定的包容/排除标准进行筛选的记录,并使用已发表的清单评估质量。报告的成本包括在内的汇款和通货膨胀到一年和货币,以便可以比较。审查议定书已在Prospero的文献审查登记册上注册(ID,CRD42019141721)。有212个非重复引用。四次被列入审查,这通常表明干预措施具有成本效益。两项研究报告说,低出生体重婴儿的母乳喂养促进在重大护理中的母乳喂养与较低的成本和更高的健康益处相关,而不是通常的护理,因此可能具有成本效益。对母乳喂养的同伴支持与持续时间较长的排他性相关,费用从每增加每月19-10英镑(两项研究)。虽然目前证据的质量相当高,但仍有有限的发布了关于促进母乳喂养的成本效益的证据。未来的研究应整合对经济分析的策略有效性的评估。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号