首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pediatrics >Can an mhealth clinical decision-making support system improve adherence to neonatal healthcare protocols in a low-resource setting?
【24h】

Can an mhealth clinical decision-making support system improve adherence to neonatal healthcare protocols in a low-resource setting?

机译:MHECHEATH临床决策支持系统可以在低资源环境中改善对新生儿医疗方案的依从性吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

This study assessed health workers’ adherence to neonatal health protocols before and during the implementation of a mobile health (mHealth) clinical decision-making support system (mCDMSS) that sought to bridge access to neonatal health protocol gap in a low-resource setting. We performed a cross-sectional document review within two purposively selected clusters (one poorly-resourced and one well-resourced), from each arm of a cluster-randomized trial at two different time points: before and during the trial. The total trial consisted of 16 clusters randomized into 8 intervention and 8 control clusters to assess the impact of an mCDMSS on neonatal mortality in Ghana. We evaluated health workers’ adherence (expressed as percentages) to birth asphyxia, neonatal jaundice and cord sepsis protocols by reviewing medical records of neonatal in-patients using a checklist. Differences in adherence to neonatal health protocols within and between the study arms were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and permutation tests for each morbidity type. In addition, we tracked concurrent neonatal health improvement activities in the clusters during the 18-month intervention period. In the intervention arm, mean adherence was 35.2% (SD?=?5.8%) and 43.6% (SD?=?27.5%) for asphyxia; 25.0% (SD?=?14.8%) and 39.3% (SD?=?27.7%) for jaundice; 52.0% (SD?=?11.0%) and 75.0% (SD?=?21.2%) for cord sepsis protocols in the pre-intervention and intervention periods respectively. In the control arm, mean adherence was 52.9% (SD?=?16.4%) and 74.5% (SD?=?14.7%) for asphyxia; 45.1% (SD?=?12.8%) and 64.6% (SD?=?8.2%) for jaundice; 53.8% (SD?=?16.0%) and 60.8% (SD?=?11.7%) for cord sepsis protocols in the pre-intervention and intervention periods respectively. We observed nonsignificant improvement in protocol adherence in the intervention clusters but significant improvement in protocol adherence in the control clusters. There were 2 concurrent neonatal health improvement activities in the intervention clusters and over 12 in the control clusters during the intervention period. Whether mHealth interventions can improve adherence to neonatal health protocols in low-resource settings cannot be ascertained by this study. Neonatal health improvement activities are however likely to improve protocol adherence. Future mHealth evaluations of protocol adherence must account for other concurrent interventions in study contexts.
机译:本研究评估了卫生工作者在执行移动卫生(MHECHEATH)临床决策支持系统(MCDMS)之前和期间的新生儿健康议定书的遵守,该支持支持系统(MCDMSS)展示在低资源环境中获得新生儿健康协议差距的展望。我们在两个不同时间点的群集随机试验的每个手臂中进行了横断面文档审查,在两次不同的时间点:在试验之前和期间。总试验由16个群集组成,随机分为8个干预和8个控制集群,以评估MCDMS对加纳新生儿死亡率的影响。通过审查使用清单审查新生儿患者的医疗记录,我们评估了卫生工作者的申请(表达为百分比)以促进窒息,新生儿黄疸和脐带脓毒症案例。使用Wilcoxon Rank-Sum和每个发病型进行评估研究武器内和之间的新生儿健康协议的差异。此外,我们在18个月干预期间履行了群集中的并发新生儿健康改善活动。在干预臂中,窒息的平均粘附量为35.2%(SD?= 5.8%)和43.6%(SD?= 27.5%); 25.0%(SD?= 14.8%)和39.3%(SD?= 27.7%)的黄疸; 52.0%(SD?=?11.0%)和75.0%(SD?= 21.2%)分别在预干预和干预期中的脐带脓毒症协议。在控制臂中,平均粘附为52.9%(SD?= 16.4%)和74.5%(SD?= 14.7%)用于窒息; 45.1%(SD?= 12.8%)和64.6%(SD?= 8.2%)的黄疸; 53.8%(SD?= 16.0%)和60.8%(SD?= 11.7%),分别进行了脊髓败血症协议和干预期。我们观察到在干预群中的协议依从性的不可思辩,而是在控制群中的协议依从性的显着改善。干预簇中有2个并发新生儿健康改善活动,在干预期间控制集群中有超过12个。本研究无法确定MHECHEATH干预措施是否可以改善对新生儿健康协议的依从性。然而,新生儿健康改善活动可能会改善协议遵守。 “未来的议定书”遵守评估必须考虑研究环境中的其他并发干预。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号