...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pediatrics >Comparison of Body Mass Index and fat percentage criteria classification of 7–13 year-old rural boys in South Africa
【24h】

Comparison of Body Mass Index and fat percentage criteria classification of 7–13 year-old rural boys in South Africa

机译:南非7-13岁农村男孩体重指数及脂肪百分比标准分类的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this paper was to investigate whether BMI and fat percentage classification criteria, would classify a sample of 7–13?year old boys from a rural background in similar nutritional categories. A cross-sectional study with a stratified random sampling included 601 rural boys (7–13?years old). Fat percentage criteria classification and BMI were calculated and compared. Maturity status, and age at peak height velocity (PHV) were indirectly determined. Statistical techniques included descriptive statistics, Pearson product correlation coefficients, the Kappa agreement test and the McNemar’s test. The level of statistical significance was set at p?≤?0.05. All age groups presented with statistically significant high correlations between BMI and fat percentage, and low to medium correlations between fat percentage and maturity age (MA). Measurement of agreement between BMI and fat percentage classifications showed poor to fair agreements for all age groups, with the exception of the eight-year old group which presented a moderate agreement. Classifications based on BMI and fat percentage, results in different classifications for the same population. Until further research has been done to determine the best classification for nutritional status, it is recommended that both classification methods be used for more accurate classification of nutritional status.
机译:本文的目的是调查BMI和脂肪百分比分类标准,将分类为7-13的样本吗?来自乡村背景的历史上的营养类别。具有分层随机抽样的横截面研究包括601个农村男孩(7-13岁)。计算并比较脂肪百分比标准分类和BMI。间接确定成熟状态和峰值高速(PHV)的年龄。统计技术包括描述性统计数据,Pearson产品相关系数,Kappa协议测试和McNemar的测试。统计显着性水平设定为p?≤≤0.05。所有年龄组在BMI和脂肪率之间具有统计学上显着的高相关,脂肪百分比与成熟年龄(MA)之间的培养基相关性。衡量BMI与脂肪百分比分类的协议表明,所有年龄组的公平协议表明,除了八岁的群体呈现温和的协议之外,差别。基于BMI和FAT百分比的分类,导致相同人群的不同分类。在进行进一步研究以确定营养状况的最佳分类之前,建议两个分类方法用于更准确的营养状况分类。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号