首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >A mixed-methods feasibility study of an arts-based intervention for patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis
【24h】

A mixed-methods feasibility study of an arts-based intervention for patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis

机译:一种基于艺术血液透析性患者的艺术干预的混合方法可行性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Haemodialysis can negatively impact quality of life and mental health. Arts-based interventions used successfully in other settings to improve health and well-being, could help address the impact of haemodialysis. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an arts-based intervention for patients receiving haemodialysis. A parallel convergent mixed-methods design was used, including a pilot cluster RCT and qualitative process evaluation. Phase 1 evaluated recruitment and retention rates through a pilot cluster RCT at a single haemodialysis unit in Northern Ireland. Participants included patients who received haemodialysis for ESKD, were over the age of 18 and had the capacity to consent. These participants were randomised to the intervention or control group according to their haemodialysis shift. The intervention involved six one-hour, one-to-one facilitated arts sessions during haemodialysis. Phase 2 explored intervention and trial acceptability through a qualitative process evaluation using semi-structured interviews based on the RE-AIM framework. Participants included 13 patients who participated in phase 1 of the study, including 9 participants from the experimental group and four participants from the control group, and nine healthcare professionals who were present on the unit during implementation. Out of 122 outpatient haemodialysis patients, 94 were assessed as eligible for participation. Twenty-four participants were randomised, meaning 80% of the target sample size was recruited and the attrition rate at 3?months was 12.5% (n?=?3). Participants viewed the arts as more accessible and enjoyable than anticipated following implementation. All participants who started the intervention (n?=?11) completed the full six sessions. Qualitative benefits of the intervention suggest improvements in mental well-being. Patient choice and facilitation were important factors for successful implementation. An arts-based intervention for patients receiving haemodialysis is acceptable for both patients and healthcare professionals, and a definitive trial is feasible. The intervention may help improve mental-wellbeing in patients receiving haemodialysis, but this requires further investigation in a definitive trial. The trial was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 14/8/2018, registration number NCT03629496 .
机译:血液透析可能会对生命和心理健康产生负面影响。基于艺术的干预措施在其他环境中成功使用以改善健康和福祉,可以帮助解决血液透析的影响。本研究旨在评估对接受血液透析性患者的术语进行随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性和可接受性。使用并联会聚混合方法设计,包括导频聚类RCT和定性过程评估。第1阶段通过在爱尔兰北部的单个血液透析单元的飞行员群体RCT评估招聘和保留率。参与者包括接受Eskd的血液透析的患者,超过18岁,并有能力同意。这些参与者根据其血液透析转变对干预或对照组随机化。干预涉及血液透析期间的一对一促进艺术课程。第2阶段通过使用基于重新瞄准框架的半结构化访谈进行定性过程评估,探讨了干预和可接受性。参与者包括参加该研究第1阶段的13名患者,其中来自实验组的9名参与者,以及来自对照组的四名参与者,以及在实施期间在该单位上存在的九个医疗保健专业人员。在122名门诊血液透析患者中​​,94名被评估为符合参与的资格。二十四名参与者随机,意味着招募了80%的目标样本规模,3个月的磨损率为12.5%(n?=?3)。与会者将艺术视为比预期的更易于获得和令人愉快的艺术。所有开始干预的参与者(n?=?11)完成了全面的六次会议。干预的定性效益表明了精神福祉的改善。患者的选择和便利是成功实施的重要因素。对于患者和医疗保健专业人员来说,接受血液透析的患者的基于术语的干预措施可以接受,并且可行的试验是可行的。干预措施可能有助于改善接受血液透析的患者的心理健康,但这需要进一步调查确定的试验。该试验在14/8/8818年14月8日,注册号NCT03629496审判在Clinicaltrials.gov上进行注册。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号