...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Influence of the proximal screws of buttress plates on the stability of vertical femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis
【24h】

Influence of the proximal screws of buttress plates on the stability of vertical femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis

机译:支撑板近端螺钉对垂直股骨颈部骨折稳定性的影响:有限元分析

获取原文
           

摘要

The treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures (vFNFs) in young patients remains challenging, with a high complication rate by using traditional techniques. The use of cannulated screws (CSs) combined with a buttress plate represents an alternative approach for treating vFNFs. However, the biomechanical influence of the use or non-use of the proximal screws of buttress plates on vFNFs stability remains unclear. This study aims to analyse the biomechanics of buttress plate fixation with or without the use of proximal screws through finite element analysis (FEA) to further understand this approach. We built five vFNFs (Pauwels angle 70°) finite element models treated using three cannulated screws (CS group) or three cannulated screws plus a locking buttress plate (buttress group). In the buttress group, use or non-use of proximal screws was carried out on two types of plates (4-hole & 6-hole). The following seven parameters were analysed to compare biomechanical properties of the five models: the stiffness; the maximal stress of the plate system (plate and screws), CSs and bone (MPS, MCS, MBS); the maximal displacement of internal fixations (plate system & CSs) and bone (MIFD, MBD); and the maximal relative displacement of interfragments (MID). Compared with CS model, the buttress models exhibited improved biomechanical properties, with increased stiffness and decreased MCS, MBS, MIFD, MBD and MID. The models fixed using buttress plates combined with a proximal screw showed greater stiffness (+?3.75% & +?8.31% vs +?0.98% & +?4.57%) and MPS (795.6 & 947.2?MPa vs 294.9 & 556.2?MPa) values, and smaller MCS, MBS, MIFD, MBD and MID (??3.41% to ??15.35% vs ??0.07% to ??4.32%) values than those using the same length plates without a proximal screw. Based on the FEA results, buttress plates can improve construct mechanics, help to resist shear force and prevent varus collapse; under the modelling conditions, the use of a proximal screw on buttress plate may be a key technical feature in improving anti-shearing ability; additionally, this screw may be essential to reduce stress and prevent re-displacement of cannulated screws and fracture fragments.
机译:在年轻患者垂直股骨颈骨折(vFNFs)的治疗仍采用传统的技术挑战,具有较高的并发症发生率。使用的与支撑板组合空心螺钉(CSS)代表了用于治疗vFNFs一种替代方法。然而,使用或不使用的上vFNFs稳定性支撑钢板的近侧螺钉的生物力学影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是分析支撑钢板固定的生物力学与或不使用的近侧螺钉通过有限元分析(FEA)以进一步了解这种方法。我们建立了5个vFNFs(保韦尔斯角70°)使用三个空心螺钉(CS组)或三个空心螺钉加的锁定支撑钢板(支撑件组)的有限元模型。在支撑件组,使用或不使用的近侧螺钉在两种类型的板(4孔和6孔)的情况下进行。以下七个参数进行了分析比较五种型号的生物力学性能:硬度;板系统(板和螺钉),CS和骨(MPS,MCS,MBS)的最大应力;内固定(板系统和CSS)和骨(MIFD,MBD)的最大位移;和interfragments的最大相对位移(MID)。与CS模型相比,支撑件模型表现出改善的生物力学性能,具有增加的刚度和减少的MCS,MBS,MIFD,MBD和MID。使用支撑板,其具有近侧螺钉结合固定的模型表现出更大的刚性(+ 3.75%+?8.31%和+ 0.98%+ 4.57%)和MPS(795.6&947.2?兆帕VS 294.9&556.2?兆帕)值,和较小的MCS,MBS,MIFD,MBD和MID(?? 3.41%至15.35 ??%比?? 0.07%至4.32 ??%)的值比使用相同长度的板,而不近侧螺钉那些。基于该FEA结果,支撑钢板可以改善构建力学,帮助抵抗剪切力,并防止内翻倒塌;建模的条件下,对支撑钢板使用近侧螺钉可以是在改进抗剪切能力的关键技术特征;另外,该螺钉可以是必须降低压力和防止空心钉和骨折碎片再移位。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号