首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Overlapping-sample Mendelian randomisation with multiple exposures: a Bayesian approach
【24h】

Overlapping-sample Mendelian randomisation with multiple exposures: a Bayesian approach

机译:重叠样本的孟德尔随机化,具有多种曝光:贝叶斯方法

获取原文
       

摘要

Mendelian randomization (MR) has been widely applied to causal inference in medical research. It uses genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to investigate putative causal relationship between an exposure and an outcome. Traditional MR methods have mainly focussed on a two-sample setting in which IV-exposure association study and IV-outcome association study are independent. However, it is not uncommon that participants from the two studies fully overlap (one-sample) or partly overlap (overlapping-sample). We proposed a Bayesian method that is applicable to all the three sample settings. In essence, we converted a two- or overlapping- sample MR to a one-sample MR where data were partly unmeasured. Assume that all study individuals were drawn from the same population and unmeasured data were missing at random. Then the missing data were treated au pair with the model parameters as unknown quantities, and thus, were imputed iteratively conditioning on the observed data and estimated parameters using Markov chain Monte Carlo. We generalised our model to allow for pleiotropy and multiple exposures and assessed its performance by a number of simulations using four metrics: mean, standard deviation, coverage and power. We also compared our method with classic MR methods. In our proposed method, higher sample overlapping rate and instrument strength led to more precise estimated causal effects with higher power. Pleiotropy had a notably negative impact on the estimates. Nevertheless, the coverages were high and our model performed well in all the sample settings overall. In comparison with classic MR, our method provided estimates with higher precision. When the true causal effects were non-zero, power of their estimates was consistently higher from our method. The performance of our method was similar to classic MR in terms of coverage. Our model offers the flexibility of being applicable to any of the sample settings. It is an important addition to the MR literature which has restricted to one- or two- sample scenarios. Given the nature of Bayesian inference, it can be easily extended to more complex MR analysis in medical research.
机译:孟德尔随机化(MR)已被广泛应用于医学研究的因果推断。它使用遗传变体作为仪器变量(IVS)来调查暴露和结果之间的推定因果关系。传统的MR方法主要侧重于其中IV曝光协会研究和IV次结果学研究的两种样本环境。然而,从这两项研究的参与者完全重叠(单个样本)或部分重叠(重叠样本)并不罕见。我们提出了一种贝叶斯方法,适用于所有三种样本设置。从本质上讲,我们将两个或重叠 - 样本MR转换为一样本先生,其中数据部分未测量。假设所有研究个体都是从相同的人口中汲取的,并且随机缺少未测量的数据。然后,将缺失的数据与模型参数进行处理Au对作为未知量,因此,使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗的观察数据和估计参数迭代地调节。我们概括了我们的模型,以允许Pleiotropy和多种曝光,并通过使用四个度量的许多模拟评估其性能:平均值,标准偏差,覆盖和功率。我们还将我们的方法与经典MR方法进行了比较。在我们提出的方法中,更高的样本重叠率和仪器强度导致更精确的估计因果效果,具有更高的功率。 Pleiotropy对估计有一个显着的负面影响。然而,覆盖范围很高,我们的模型在整个样本设置中均匀地表现良好。与经典MR相比,我们的方法提供了更高的精度估计。当真正的因果效应是非零时,它们的估计力量从我们的方法始终如一。我们的方法的性能与覆盖范围的经典MR类似。我们的模型提供适用于任何示例设置的灵活性。这是对MR文献的重要补充,该文献限制了一个或两个样本场景。鉴于贝叶斯推理的性质,它可以很容易地扩展到医学研究中更复杂的MR分析。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号