首页> 外文期刊>Breast Cancer Research >Does primary neoadjuvant systemic therapy eradicate minimal residual disease? Analysis of disseminated and circulating tumor cells before and after therapy
【24h】

Does primary neoadjuvant systemic therapy eradicate minimal residual disease? Analysis of disseminated and circulating tumor cells before and after therapy

机译:原发性新辅助系统治疗是否根除最少的残留疾病?治疗前后散发和循环肿瘤细胞分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Patients with breast cancer (BC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) may experience metastatic relapse despite achieving a pathologic complete response. We analyzed patients with BC before and after NACT for disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow(BM); comprehensively characterized circulating tumor cells (CTCs), including stem cell–like CTCs (slCTCs), in blood to prove the effectiveness of treatment on these cells; and correlated these findings with response to therapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). CTCs (n?=?135) and slCTCs (n?=?91) before and after NACT were analyzed using the AdnaTest BreastCancer, AdnaTest TumorStemCell, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (QIAGEN Hannover GmbH Germany). The expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and the resistance marker excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 1 (ERCC1), nuclease were studied in separate single-plex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction experiments. DTCs were evaluated in 142 patients before and 165 patients after NACT using the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3 for immunocytochemistry. The positivity rates for DTCs, CTCs, and slCTCs were 27?%, 24?%, and 51?% before and 20?%, 8?%, and 20?% after NACT, respectively. Interestingly, 72?% of CTCs present after therapy were positive for ERCC1, and CTCs before (p?=?0.005) and after NACT (p?=?0.05) were significantly associated with the presence of slCTCs. Whereas no significant associations with clinical parameters were found for CTCs and slCTCs, DTCs were significantly associated with nodal status (p?=?0.03) and histology (0.046) before NACT and with the immunohistochemical subtype (p?=?0.02) after NACT. Univariable Cox regression analysis revealed that age (p?=?0.0065), tumor size before NACT (p?=?0.0473), nodal status after NACT (p?=?0.0137), and response to NACT (p?=?0.0136) were significantly correlated with PFS, whereas age (p?=?0.0162) and nodal status after NACT (p?=?0.0243) were significantly associated with OS. No significant correlations were found for DTCs or any CTCs before and after therapy with regard to PFS and OS. Although CTCs were eradicated more effectively than DTCs, CTCs detected after treatment seemed to be associated with tumor cells showing tumor stem cell characteristics as well as with resistant tumor cell populations that might indicate a worse outcome in the future. Thus, these patients might benefit from additional second-line treatment protocols including bisphosphonates for the eradication of DTCs.
机译:患有乳腺癌(BC)的患者虽然实现了病理完全反应,但仍可能经历转移复发。我们在骨髓(BM)中分析了BC之前和之后的BC患者;全面表征循环肿瘤细胞(CTC),包括干细胞样CTCs(SLCTC),血液中的血液中的循环(SLCTC),以证明对这些细胞的治疗有效性;并将这些发现与响应治疗,无进展的存活(PFS)和总存活(OS)相关联。使用Adnatest乳腺癌,Adnatest Tumorstemcell和上皮 - 间充质转换(Qiagen Hannover GmbH德国)分析了Nact之前和之后的CTCS(n?= 135)和SLCTC(n?=Δ91)。在单独的单Plex逆转录聚合酶链反应实验中,研究了雌激素受体,孕酮受体和抗性标记切除修复交叉互补啮齿合物修复缺乏,核糖酶,核酸酶。 DTC在142名患者之前和165名患者使用Pan-Cytokeratin抗体A45-B / B3进行免疫细胞化学。分别在NACT后,DTCS,CTC和SLCTC的阳性率为27μm,24℃,24μm,20μm,20μm,8μl%,20μl%。有趣的是,治疗后患者的72次患者均为ERCC1和CTC(P?= 0.005)和后部的CTC(P?= 0.05)与SLCTC的存在显着相关。然而,没有针对CTCS和SLCTC的临床参数的显着关联,并且在NACT之前与NACT和免疫组织化学亚型(P≤x0.02)显着与Nodal状态(p?= 0.03)和组织学(0.046)显着相关。不稳定的Cox回归分析显示,年龄(p?= 0.0065),结构前的肿瘤大小(p?= 0.0473),结婚后的节点状态(p?= 0.0137),并反应nact(p?= 0.0136)与PFS显着相关,而Age(P?= 0.0162)和NACT后的节点状态(P?= 0.0243)显着与OS显着相关。对PFS和OS之前和治疗前后的DTC或任何CTC没有发现显着相关性。虽然CTCS比DTCS更有效地消除,但治疗后检测到的CTC似乎与显示肿瘤干细胞特征以及未来可能表现出更糟糕的肿瘤细胞群的肿瘤细胞相关。因此,这些患者可能受益于额外的第二线治疗方案,包括用于消除DTC的双膦酸盐。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号