首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Comparison of health care utilization among patients affiliated and not affiliated with healthcare professionals in China
【24h】

Comparison of health care utilization among patients affiliated and not affiliated with healthcare professionals in China

机译:中国医疗保健专业人员患者医疗利用的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Doing “more” in healthcare can be a major threat to the delivery of high-quality health care. It is important to identify the supplier-induced demand (SID) of health care. This study aims to test SID hypothesis by comparing health care utilization among patients affiliated with healthcare professionals and their counterpart patients not affiliated with healthcare professionals. We used coarsened exact matching to compare the health care utilization and expenditure between patients affiliated and not affiliated with healthcare professionals. Using cross-sectional data of the China Labour-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS) in 2014, we identified 806 patients affiliated with healthcare professionals and 22,788 patients not affiliated with healthcare professionals. The main outcomes were outpatient proportion and expenditure as well as inpatient proportion and expenditure. The matched outpatient proportion of patients not affiliated with healthcare professionals was 0.6% higher (P?=?0.754) than that of their counterparts, and the matched inpatient proportion was 1.1% lower (P?=?0.167). Patients not affiliated with healthcare professionals paid significantly more (680 CNY or 111 USD, P??0.001) than their counterparts did per outpatient visit (1126 CNY [95% CI 885–1368] vs. 446 CNY [95% CI 248–643]), while patients not affiliated with healthcare professionals paid insignificantly less (2061 CNY or 336 USD, P?=?0.751) than their counterparts did per inpatient visit (15583 CNY [95% CI 12052–19115] vs. 17645 CNY [95% CI 4884–30406]). Our results lend support to the SID hypothesis and highlight the need for policies to address the large outpatient care expenses among patients not affiliated with healthcare professionals. Our study also suggests that as the public becomes more informed, the demand of health care may persist while heath care expenditure per outpatient visit may decline sharply due to the weakened SID. To address misbehaviors and contain health care costs, it is important to realign provider incentives.
机译:在医疗保健中进行“更多”可能是对提供高质量保健的重大威胁。确定供应商诱导的医疗保健需求(SID)非常重要。本研究旨在通过比较医疗保健专业人员的患者的医疗利用和未隶属于医疗专业人士的患者来测试SID假设。我们使用粗略的精确匹配,以比较附属患者之间的医疗利用率和支出,而不是与医疗保健专业人员无关。利用2014年中国劳动力动力学调查(CLD)的横断面数据,我们确定了806名隶属患有医疗保健专业人员的患者,22,788名无隶属于医疗保健专业人员。主要结果是门诊比例和支出以及住院比例和支出。与医疗专业人员无附属的患者的匹配门诊比例高于其对应物的0.6%(P?= 0.754),并且匹配的住院比例为1.1%(P?= 0.167)。没有医疗专业人士的患者比他们门诊访问的同行(680 CNY或111美元,P?0.001)隶属于(680 CNY或111美元)(1126 CNY [95%CI 885-1368]与446 CNY [95%CI 248- 643]),而没有医疗专业人士的患者较少(2061年CNY或336 USD,P?= 0.751),而不是每只住院病人访问(15583 CNY [95%CI 12052-19115]与17645 CNY [ 95%CI 4884-30406])。我们的结果为SID假设提供了支持,并突出了政策的需求,以解决未与医疗保健专业人员无关的患者的大型门诊护理费用。我们的研究还表明,随着公众变得更加了解,卫生保健的需求可能持续存在,而由于弱化的SID,每次门诊期间的荒地护理费用可能会急剧下降。为了解决行为不端,含有医疗费用,重要的是重新调整提供者激励措施。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号