...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >“What counts can’t always be measured” : a qualitative exploration of general practitioners’ conceptualisation of quality for community pharmacy services
【24h】

“What counts can’t always be measured” : a qualitative exploration of general practitioners’ conceptualisation of quality for community pharmacy services

机译:“无法衡量的是什么”:全科医生对社区药房服务质量概念化的定性探索

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The expansion of community pharmacy services is one solution to relieve pressure on general practice in the United Kingdom (UK). There is a paucity of research of general practitioners’ (GPs’) perspectives of quality of care in the community pharmacy sector. The purpose of this study was to explore GPs’: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs in the UK. GPs were recruited using the snowballing technique and professional networks. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using an interpretive approach. Interviews were completed with 20 GPs from Scotland (n?=?8) and England (n?=?12). Multidimensional and inter-related concepts of quality were identified; most dimensions related to patient benefit, as well as impact on GP workload or other health service provision. Interviewees cautioned that “what counts can’t always be measured”. GPs’ expectations of quality often mirrored those of their own sector, but were ambivalent about the adoption of a quality outcome framework-type approach. Pharmacist involvement was expected to ensure quality in the management of ‘acute consultations’, however, GPs lacked awareness of community pharmacy personnel type, roles and training. Interviewees’ perceptions of quality varied by pharmacy type; independent pharmacies were sometimes associated with higher quality service delivery than larger chain organisations. Quality frameworks for community pharmacy services could be partly informed by GP experience and expectations, but need to be contextual to reflect differences between both settings. The importance of person-centred care, consistency and continuity was emphasised together with the need for competent personnel and privacy of interactions.
机译:社区药房服务的扩展是一种解决联合王国(英国)一般做法的压力的解决方案。在社区药房部门的护理质量的普通从业者(GPS')视角研究了缺乏研究。本研究的目的是探索GPS':在英国的GPS进行半结构化访谈。使用雪球技术和专业网络招募GPS。采访是使用解释方法进行音频记录的,转录和分析。采访完成了来自苏格兰的20个GPS(N?=?8)和英格兰(N?=?12)。鉴定了多维和相关的质量概念;大多数与患者受益相关的尺寸,以及对GP工作量或其他健康服务提供的影响。受访者警告说,“无法衡量的是什么”。 GPS对质量的期望往往反映了他们自己的部门,但却是通过了采用质量结果框架类型方法的矛盾。预计药剂师参与有望确保在“急性磋商”管理中的质量,但GPS缺乏对社区药房人员类型,角色和培训的认识。受访者对药房类型不同的质量看;独立的药店有时与更高质量的服务交付相关,而不是大型链组织。可以通过GP体验和期望部分地通知社区药房服务的质量框架,但需要上下文来反映两个设置之间的差异。以人为本的护理,一致性和连续性的重要性以及有必要的人员和互动的隐私。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号