...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Emergency Medicine >Dispatch of a helicopter emergency medicine service to patients with a sudden, unexplained loss of consciousness of medical origin
【24h】

Dispatch of a helicopter emergency medicine service to patients with a sudden, unexplained loss of consciousness of medical origin

机译:向患者派出直升机急诊医学服务,突然,无法解释的医学原产地意识丧失

获取原文
           

摘要

Sudden loss of consciousness (LOC) in the prehospital setting in the absence of cardiac arrest and seizure activity may be a challenge from a dispatcher’s perspective: The aetiology is varied, with many causes being transient and mostly self-limiting, whereas other causes are potentially life threatening. In this study we aim to evaluate the dispatch of HEMS to patients with LOC of medical origin, by exploring to which patients with a LOC HEMS is dispatched, which interventions HEMS teams perform in these patients, and whether HEMS interventions can be predicted by patient characteristics. We performed retrospective cohort study of all patients with a reported unexplained LOC (e.g. not attributable to a circulatory arrest or seizures) attended by the Air Ambulance Kent, Surrey & Sussex (AAKSS), over a 4-year period (July 2013–December 2017). Primary outcome was defined as the number of HEMS-specific interventions performed in patients with unexplained LOC. Secondary outcome was the relation of clinical- and dispatch criteria with HEMS interventions being performed. During the study period, 127 patients with unexplained LOC were attended by HEMS. HEMS was dispatched directly to 25.2% of the patients, but mostly (74.8%) on request of the ground ambulance crews. HEMS interventions were performed in 65% of the patients (Prehospital Emergency Anaesthesia 56%, hyperosmolar therapy 21%, antibiotic/antiviral therapy 8%, vasopressor therapy 6%) and HEMS conveyed most patients (77%) to hospital. Acute neurological pathology was a prevalent underlying cause of unexplained LOC: 38% had gross pathology on their CT-scan upon arrival in hospital. Both GCS (r?=???0.60, p??.001) and SBP (r?=?0.31, p??.001) were related to HEMS interventions being performed on scene. A GCS??13 predicted the need for HEMS interventions in our population with a sensitivity of 94.9% and a specificity 75% (AUC 0.85). HEMS dispatchers and ambulance personnel are able to identify a cohort of patients with unexplained LOC of medical origin who suffer from potentially life threatening (mainly neurological) pathology, in whom HEMS specific intervention are frequently required. Presenting GCS can be used to inform the triage process of patients with LOC at an early stage.
机译:在没有心脏骤停和癫痫发作活动的情况下,在缺乏心脏骤停和癫痫发作活动中突然失去意识(LOC)可能是宣告员视野中的挑战:变化是多变的,许多原因是短暂的,大多是自我限制的,而其他原因可能是暂不自限制生命威胁。在这项研究中,我们的目标是通过探索探索患有LOC HEM的患者,评估HEMS向医学源患者的调度,这些患者在这些患者中进行干预措施,以及患者特征可以预测下摆干预症。我们在4年期间(2013年7月至2017年12月)(2013年7月)(2013年7月 - 2017年7月)(2013年7月)(2013年7月)(2013年7月 - 2017年12月)(2013年7月)(2013年7月)(2013年7月)(2013年7月 - 2017年12月)(例如2013年至12月)(7月)(例如2013年至12月)(2013年7月)(例如,)对所有患者的回顾性队列研究)。主要结果定义为在未解释的LOC患者中表演的特异性干预次数。次要结果是临床和派遣标准与正在进行的下摆干预措施的关系。在研究期间,下摆患有127名未解释的LOC患者。枯草直接派出到25.2%的患者,但主要是(74.8%)根据地面救护车工作人员要求。 HEMS干预患者在65%的患者中进行(预科急诊麻醉56%,Hyperosmolar治疗21%,抗生素/抗病毒治疗8%,血管加压器治疗6%)和下摆传达大多数患者(77%)到医院。急性神经病理学是一种普遍的潜在原因的基因座:38%在抵达医院时对他们的CT扫描进行了总理。 GCS(R?= ??? 0.60,p?<= 001)和SBP(R?= 0.31,P?<β.001)与在场景中进行的下摆干预有关。 GCS?<?13预测我们群体中凋亡的需求,敏感性为94.9%,特异性75%(AUC 0.85)。下摆调度员和救护车人员能够识别患有未解释的医学源招诊所的患者患者患者,患有潜在的危及生命(主要是神经系统)病理学,其中常常需要针对特定​​干预的人。呈现GCS可用于在早期阶段通知患者的患者的分类过程。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号