首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Imaging >Evaluation of liver function using liver parenchyma, spleen and portal vein signal intensities during the hepatobiliary phase in Gd-EOB-D TPA-enhanced MRI
【24h】

Evaluation of liver function using liver parenchyma, spleen and portal vein signal intensities during the hepatobiliary phase in Gd-EOB-D TPA-enhanced MRI

机译:在GD-Eob-D TPA增强MRI中使用肝脏疗法,脾脏和门静脉信号强度评价肝脏功能,脾脏和门静脉信号强度

获取原文
       

摘要

Previous studies have used signal intensity (SI) to reflect liver function. However, few studies have evaluated liver function via the portal vein. Regarding the SI of the liver, spleen, and portal vein, no study has indicated which can best reflect liver function. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate whether these parameters can evaluate liver function in patients with cirrhosis and determine which is the best parameter. 120 patients with normal livers (n?=?41) or Child–Pugh class A (n?=?50), B (n?=?21) or C (n?=?8) disease who had undergone Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were retrospectively reviewed. Comparisons of the MRI data (liver parenchyma SI, portal vein SI, and spleen SI and liver-to-portal vein contrast ratio (LPC), liver-to-spleen contrast ratio (LSC), and portal vein-to-spleen contrast ratio (PSC)) in the 15-min hepatobiliary phase images were performed among the groups, and the correlations among the liver function parameters (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, albumin, creatinine, platelet count, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio), liver function scores and MRI data were also quantitatively analysed. Significant differences were observed in the liver parenchyma SI, LPC and LSC among the groups. These values all decreased gradually from normal livers to Child–Pugh class C cirrhotic livers (P 0.05). LPC showed a stronger correlation with the Child–Pugh score and MELD score than LSC and the liver parenchyma SI. The order of the AUCs of these parameters, from largest to smallest, was as follows: LPC, LSC, and liver parenchyma SI (P??0.05). The liver parenchyma SI, LSC and LPC may be used as alternative imaging biomarkers to assess liver function, while the portal vein SI and PSC do not reflect liver function. Furthermore, LPC values can more effectively distinguish severity among patients with cirrhosis than the liver parenchyma SI and LSC.
机译:以前的研究使用了信号强度(Si)来反映肝功能。然而,很少有研究通过门静脉评估肝功能。关于肝脏,脾脏和门静脉的Si,没有表明可以最佳地反映肝功能。因此,本研究的目的是探讨这些参数是否可以评估肝硬化患者的肝功能,并确定哪个是最佳参数。 120例正常肝脏(n?= 41)或儿童-ps-pugh as(n?=?50),b(n?=Δ21)或c(n?=?8)疾病,患有Gd-eob的疾病 - 回顾性审查了-DTPA-增强的MRI。 MRI数据的比较(肝脏实质SI,门静脉SI,脾脏SI和肝转录静脉对比度(LPC),肝转脾对比度(LSC)和门静脉对脾脏对比度(PSC))在基团中进行15分钟的肝胆相图像,以及肝功能参数之间的相关性(总胆红素,直接胆红素,间接胆红素,天冬氨酸氨基转移酶,丙氨酸氨基转移酶,白蛋白,肌酐,血小板计数,凝血酶原时间和国际标准化比率),肝功能分数和MRI数据也被定量分析。在组中,在肝脏薄壁型Si,LPC和LSC中观察到显着差异。这些值均从正常肝脏逐渐减少到Child-Pugh类C Cirrhotic Livers(P 0.05)。 LPC与Child-Pugh得分和Meld得分比LSC和肝脏实质Si相比,LPC更强。这些参数的AUC的顺序,从最大到最小,如下:LPC,LSC和肝脏薄壁SI(P?>?0.05)。肝脏牙套Si,LSC和LPC可用作替代成像生物标志物以评估肝功能,而门静脉Si和PSC不反映肝功能。此外,LPC值可以更有效地区分肝硬化患者的严重程度,而不是肝脏薄壁症和LSC。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号