...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Imaging >Evaluating sensitivity and specificity of handheld point-of-care ultrasound testing for gynecologic pathology: a pilot study for use in low resource settings
【24h】

Evaluating sensitivity and specificity of handheld point-of-care ultrasound testing for gynecologic pathology: a pilot study for use in low resource settings

机译:评估妇科病理学手持式超声检测的灵敏度和特异性:在低资源设置中使用的试验研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Point-of-care ultrasound (POC-US) is a diagnostic test conducted at the site of patient care with direct interpretation by the clinician, providing immediate results. POC-US for gynecologic application is not well characterized by current literature yet has the potential to increase access in limited resource settings. We compared the diagnostics of three POC-US devices for gynecologic (GYN) pathology and then performed evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of a single best POC-US device for intended use in a low resource setting. This is prospective, pilot descriptive study of 60 subjects. In part 1, comparison of three POC-US devices was performed. Twenty subjects underwent POC-US with three test units [GE Vscan (Vscan), Sonosite Iviz (Iviz), Philips Lumify (Lumify)] followed by diagnostic ultrasound (Dx-US) for reference imaging. Image quality and correlation for devices was scored by blinded reviewers and quantitative measurements of GYN pathology were compared. In part 2, forty subjects underwent POC-US validation with the highest scoring device (Lumify) and Dx-US for reference imaging. Concordance of POC-US operator-interpreted diagnosis with reference imaging interpretation were assessed by Cohen’s unweighted kappa coefficient. Accuracy and agreement of POC-US were assessed by linear regression and Bland–Altman plot analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of POC-US for gynecologic pathologies were calculated. In aggregate qualitative measurements, Lumify and Iviz units performed superiorly to Vscan. There was no statistically significant difference in quantitative measurements between devices, but a trend towards lower mean error was seen for Lumify and Iviz as compared to Vscan. Lumify device had highest overall scoring and was selected for further testing. In validation comparison of Lumify to Dx-US, no statistically significant differences were found for measurements of endometrium, uterus, ovaries, adnexal pathology, or leiomyomata, (P 0.7). Sensitivity and specificity of detecting pathology was 80–100% with PPV and NPV 76–100%. Among three POC-US devices, Lumify and Iviz devices show highest potential for successful application to clinical gynecologic ultrasound. Clinician-performed POC-US has high diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for basic GYN anatomy and pathology. POC-US is an acceptable and feasible diagnostic tool with potential for future application in a low resource setting to increase access to ultrasound.
机译:护理点超声(PoC-US)是临床医生直接解释的患者护理现场进行的诊断测试,提供即时结果。 PoC-US用于妇科应用程序的特征在于目前的文献,但有可能增加有限资源设置的访问。我们将三个PoC-US设备的诊断与妇科(GYN)病理学进行了比较,然后对低资源设置中预期用途进行了对单一最佳PoC-US设备的灵敏度和特异性的评估。这是预期的60个科目的试点描述性研究。在第1部分中,进行了三个PoC-US设备的比较。二十个受试者接受了PoC-US,具有三个测试单元[GE VSCAN(VSCAN),SONOSITE IVIZ(IVIZ),飞利浦LUMIFY(LUMIFY)],然后是诊断超声(DX-US)用于参考成像。通过盲化评审仪评分设备的图像质量和相关性,并进行了对Gyn病理的定量测量。在第2部分中,40个受试者接受了具有最高评分设备(LUMIFY)和DX-US供参考成像的PoC-US验证。通过Cohen的未加权的Kappa系数评估了Poc-US操作员解释诊断的PoC-US操作员解释的诊断。通过线性回归和Bland-Altman Plot分析评估PoC-US的准确性和协议。计算PoC-US对妇科病理的敏感性和特异性。在聚合定性测量中,流量和IVIZ单元优于VSCan。与VSCan相比,设备之间的定量测量没有统计学上有统计学差异,但与VSCAN相比,对Lumify和Iviz的趋势进行了趋势。 LUMIFY设备的总体评分最高,选择进一步测试。在验证对DX-US的验证比较中,没有发现针对子宫内膜,子宫,卵巢,副病理学或Leiomyomata的测量的统计学上显着的差异(p 0.7)。检测病理学的敏感性和特异性为80-100%,PPV和NPV 76-100%。在三个POC-US设备中,LUMIFY和IVIZ器件显示出临床妇科超声的成功应用的最高潜力。临床医生进行的PoC-US对基础Gyn解剖学和病理学具有高的诊断准确性,敏感性和特异性。 PoC-US是一种可接受和可行的诊断工具,具有未来应用在低资源设置中的可能性,以增加对超声波的访问。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号