...
首页> 外文期刊>Bioautomation >Multi-type Arrhythmia Classification: Assessment of the Potential of Time and Frequency Domain Features and Different Classifiers
【24h】

Multi-type Arrhythmia Classification: Assessment of the Potential of Time and Frequency Domain Features and Different Classifiers

机译:多型心律分类:评估时间和频域特征和不同分类器的潜力

获取原文

摘要

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant risk of heart failure and consequent death. Its episodic appearance, the wide variety of arrhythmias exhibiting irregular AF-like RR intervals and noises accompanying the ECG acquisition, impede the reliable AF detection. Therefore, the Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2017 organizers encourage the development of methods for classification of short, single-lead ECG as AF, normal sinus rhythm (NSR), other rhythm (OR), or noisy signal (NOISE). This study presents a set of 118 time and frequency domain feature including descriptors of the RR and PP intervals; QRS and P-wave amplitudes; ECG behavior within the TQ intervals, deviation of the TQ and PQRST segments from their first principle component analysis vector; dominant frequency; regularity index, width and area of the power spectrum estimated for the ECG signal with eliminated QRS complexes. Three classification techniques have been applied over the 118 ECG features – linear discriminant analysis (LDA), classification tree (CT) and neural network (NN) approach. The scores over a test subset are: (i) FNSR = 0.81; FAF = 0.61; FOR = 0.53, F1 = 0.65 for CT, which is the most simple model; (ii) FNSR = 0.82; FAF = 0.62; FOR = 0.53, F1 = 0.66 for LDA, which is the model with the most reproducible accuracy results; (iii) FNSR = 0.86; FAF = 0.74; FOR = 0.57, F1 = 0.72 for NN, which is the most accurate model.
机译:心房颤动(AF)与心力衰竭的显着风险有关,随后的死亡。其焦虑外观,各种心律失常表现出不规则的AF样RR间隔和伴随心电图采集的噪声,妨碍了可靠的AF检测。因此,2017年组织者在心脏病学挑战中的计算鼓励开发短,单引主ECG作为AF,正常窦性心律(NSR),其他节奏(或)或嘈杂信号(噪声)的分类方法。本研究显示了一组118个时间和频域特征,包括RR和PP间隔的描述符; QRS和P波振荡; TQ间隔内的ECG行为,TQ和PQRST段的偏差与他们的第一个原理分量分析向量;主导频率;具有消除QRS复合物的ECG信号估计的正则射指数,宽度和面积。在118个ECG特征 - 线性判别分析(LDA),分类树(CT)和神经网络(NN)方法中,已经应用了三种分类技术。测试子集的得分为:(i)FNSR = 0.81; FAF = 0.61;对于CT,F1 = 0.53,F1 = 0.65,这是最简单的模型; (ii)FNSR = 0.82; FAF = 0.62;对于LDA的= 0.53,F1 = 0.66,这是具有最可重复的精度结果的模型; (iii)FNSR = 0.86; FAF = 0.74;对于NN的= 0.57,F1 = 0.72,这是最准确的模型。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号