首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Comparison of Anterior only and Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach in Treating Lumbosacral Tuberculosis
【24h】

Comparison of Anterior only and Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach in Treating Lumbosacral Tuberculosis

机译:腰骶结核治疗腰骶部梗死和后近方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

A combined anterior and posterior (AP) surgical approach is a popular treatment modality of lumbosacral tuberculosis, but it is often traumatic and complicated. The present study aims to find whether the anterior only approach with the ARCH plate system is less invasive than the AP approach in treating lumbosacral tuberculosis. The ARCH plate system is an innovative anatomic lumbosacral anterior multi-directional locking plate system which was devised with due consideration to the anatomic features of the lumbosacral spine and irregular destruction of involved vertebral endplates. In this retrospective study, 32 patients with lumbosacral tuberculosis underwent surgeries via either the anterior only approach (ARCH group, 18 patients) using the ARCH system or the conventional combined anterior and posterior approach (AP group, 14 patients). American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), bone union status, ESR, CRP, intervertebral foraminal height between L5 and S1, the vertical height between the anterior upper edge of L5 and S1 vertebral body, lumbosacral angle, and the physiological lordosis of between L1 and S1 from both groups were recorded and compared. All patients were followed up for at least two years. The average duration of operation, blood loss, and length of hospital admission of the ARCH group (154.6?min, 361.1?ml&18.3days) was significantly smaller and shorter(p??0.001, p??0.001 & p?=?0.008) that those of the AP group(465.5?min, 814.3?ml & 24.6days). The ODI score(p?=?0.08, 0.471, 0.06, 0.07, 0.107), the VAS score(p?=?0.099, 0.249, 0.073, 0.103, 0.273), the intervertebral foraminal height between L5 and S1(p?=?0.826, 0.073, 0.085), L5-S1 height(p?=?0.057, 0.234, 0.094), lumbosacral angle(p?=?0.052, 0.242, 0.825), and L5-S1 lordosis(p?=?0.146, 0.129, 0.053) of both groups showed no significant difference in any of the time points. The anterior only approach using the ARCH system is as effective as the combined anterior and posterior approach and is less traumatic in treating lumbosacral tuberculosis.
机译:组合前和后(AP)手术方法是腰骶结核病的普遍治疗方式,但它通常是创伤性和复杂的。本研究旨在找到与拱板系统的近似接近的侵入性比治疗Lumbosacral肺结核的AP方法更少。拱板系统是一款创新的解剖腰骶前锁定板系统,以适当考虑腰骶脊柱的解剖特征和涉及椎体胎盘的不规则破坏。在这项回顾性研究中,32例腰骶结节患者通过拱门系统或常规组合前和后方法(AP组,14名患者)的近期接近(Arch Group,18名患者)进行手术治疗手术。美国脊柱损伤协会(亚洲)分数,视觉模拟量表(VAS)分数,oswestry残疾指数(ODI),骨联盟状态,ESR,CRP,L5和S1之间的椎间形高度,L5的前上边缘之间的垂直高度记录和比较S1椎体,腰骶角,腰骶角和来自两组的L1和S1之间的生理脊髓源性。所有患者均持续至少两年。拱门的平均手术,失血和医院入院长度的持续时间(154.6?min,361.1?ml&18.3days)明显较小,更短(P?<?0.001,p?<0.001&p?= ?0.008)AP组的那些(465.5?min,814.3?ml&24.6days)。 odi得分(p?= 0.08,0.471,0.06,0.07,0.107),VAS得分(P?= 0.099,0.249,0.073,0.103,0.273),L5和S1之间的椎间传染性高度(P?= ?0.826,0.073,0.085),L5-S1高度(p?= 0.057,0.234,0.094),腰骶角(P?= 0.052,0.242,0.825)和L5-S1 lordosis(P?= 0.146,两组的0.129,0.053)显示任何时间点都没有显着差异。使用拱形系统的前方法与组合前和后近方法一样有效,并且在治疗腰骶结核时具有更少的创伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号