首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults – A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
【24h】

The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults – A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

机译:在健康年轻人和老年人行走的代谢成本 - 系统审查和元分析

获取原文
           

摘要

The Metabolic Cost of Walking (MCoW) is an important variable of daily life that has been studied extensively. Several studies suggest that MCoW is higher in Older Adults (OA) than in Young Adults (YA). However, it is difficult to compare values across studies due to differences in the way MCoW was expressed, the units in which it was reported and the walking speed at which it was measured. To provide an overview of MCoW in OA and YA and to investigate the quantitative effect of age on MCoW, we have conducted a literature review and performed two meta-analyses. We extracted data on MCoW in healthy YA (18-41 years old) and healthy OA (≥59 years old) and calculated, if not already reported, the Gross (GCoW) and Net MCoW (NCoW) in J/kg/m. If studies reported MCoW measured at multiple speeds, we selected those values for YA and OA at which MCoW was minimal. All studies directly comparing YA and OA were selected for meta-analyses. From all studies reviewed, the average GCoW in YA was 3.4?±?0.4?J/kg/m and 3.8?±?0.4?J/kg/m in OA (~12% more in OA), and the average NCoW in YA was 2.4?±?0.4?J/kg/m and 2.8?±?0.5?J/kg/m in OA (~17% more in OA). Our meta-analyses indicated a statistically significant elevation of both GCoW and NCoW (p??0.001) for OA. In terms of GCoW, OA expended about 0.3?J/kg/m more metabolic energy than YA and about 0.4?J/kg/m more metabolic energy than YA in terms of NCoW. Our study showed a statistically significant elevation in MCoW of OA over YA. However, from the literature it is unclear if this elevation is directly caused by age or due to an interaction between age and methodology. We recommend further research comparing MCoW in healthy OA and YA during "natural" over-ground walking and treadmill walking, after sufficient familiarization time.
机译:步行(MCOW)​​的代谢成本是日常生活的一个重要变量,这是广泛研究的。几项研究表明,老年人(OA)的MCOW比年轻人(YA)更高。然而,由于表达MCOW的方式,难以对研究的价值进行比较,其中报道的单位以及测量它的步行速度。为了提供OA和YA的MCOW概述,并调查MCOW的年龄的定量效果,我们进行了文献综述并进行了两次荟萃分析。我们在健康的YA(18-41岁)和健康的OA(≥59岁)中提取了MCOM的数据,并计算出,如果尚未报告,则j / kg / m中的总(gcow)和净麦管(ncow)。如果研究报告MCOW以多速测量,我们为ya和OA选择了那些值,MCOW最小。选择直接比较YA和OA的研究进行Meta-Analyzes。从所有审查的研究中,YA的平均GCOW为3.4?±0.4?j / kg / m和3.8?±0.4?0.4?j / kg / m在OA(在OA中〜12%),平均ncow YA为2.4?±0.4?j / kg / m和2.8?±0.5?j / kg / m在Oa(oa中〜17%)。我们的META分析表明OA的GCOW和NCOW的统计显着高度(p?<0.001)。在GCOW方面,OA在NCow方面比YA和约0.4×j / kg / m更高的代谢能量消耗约0.3?j / kg / m。我们的研究表明,在YA的OA McOM中表现出统计学上的高度。然而,从文献中,如果这种高程是直接造成的年龄或由于年龄和方法之间的相互作用,则目前尚不清楚。我们建议在充分熟悉的时间后,在“自然”在地面行走和跑步机走路期间将MCOW与YA的进一步研究进行了进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号