...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Benefits of implementing a rapid access clinic in a high-volume inflammatory bowel disease center: Access, resource utilization and outcomes
【24h】

Benefits of implementing a rapid access clinic in a high-volume inflammatory bowel disease center: Access, resource utilization and outcomes

机译:在大批量炎症肠病中实施快速接入诊所的好处:访问,资源利用和结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND Emergency situations in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) put significant burden on both the patient and the healthcare system. AIM To prospectively measure Quality-of-Care indicators and resource utilization after the implementation of the new rapid access clinic service (RAC) at a tertiary IBD center. METHODS Patient access, resource utilization and outcome parameters were collected from consecutive patients contacting the RAC between July 2017 and March 2019 in this observational study. For comparing resource utilization and healthcare costs, emergency department (ED) visits of IBD patients with no access to RAC services were evaluated between January 2018 and January 2019. Time to appointment, diagnostic methods, change in medical therapy, unplanned ED visits, hospitalizations and surgical admissions were calculated and compared. RESULTS 488 patients (Crohn’s disease: 68.4%/ulcerative colitis: 31.6%) contacted the RAC with a valid medical reason. Median time to visit with an IBD specialist following the index contact was 2 d. Patients had objective clinical and laboratory assessment (C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin in 91% and 73%). Fast-track colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy was performed in 24.6% of the patients, while computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in only 8.1%. Medical therapy was changed in 54.4%. ED visits within 30 d following the RAC visit occurred in 8.8% (unplanned ED visit rate: 5.9%). Diagnostic procedures and resource utilization at the ED ( n = 135 patients) were substantially different compared to RAC users: Abdominal computed tomography was more frequent (65.7%, P 0.001), coupled with multiple specialist consults, more frequent hospital admission ( P 0.001), higher steroid initiation ( P 0.001). Average medical cost estimates of diagnostic procedures and services per patient was $403 CAD vs $1885 CAD comparing all RAC and ED visits. CONCLUSION Implementation of a RAC improved patient care by facilitating easier access to IBD specific medical care, optimized resource utilization and helped avoiding ED visits and subsequent hospitalizations.
机译:背景技术炎症性肠病疾病(IBD)的紧急情况对患者和医疗保健系统进行了重大负担。旨在在第三届IBD中心实施新的快速访问诊所服务(RAC)后估算护理质量指标和资源利用。方法从连续患者收集患者访问,资源利用和结果参数,从2017年7月至2019年7月至2019年3月在这项观察研究中与RAC联系起来。为了比较资源利用和医疗费用,在2018年1月至2019年1月间无权访问RAC服务的IBD患者的急诊部门(ED)访问。预约,诊断方法,医疗治疗的变化,无计划的ed访问,住院和住院时间计算并进行了手术入学。结果488例患者(CROHN病:68.4%/溃疡性结肠炎:31.6%)以有效的医疗原因与RAC联系。在索引联系人后面使用IBD专家访问中位时间是2天。患者有客观的临床和实验室评估(C-反应蛋白和粪便酸蛋白,91%和73%)。在24.6%的患者中进行快速轨道结肠镜检查/乙状体镜检查,而计算机断层摄影/磁共振成像仅为8.1%。医疗疗法发生在54.4%。在RAC访问后30 d之内的ed访问时间为8.8%(无计划ED访问率:5.9%)。与RAC用户相比,ED(N = 135名患者)的诊断程序和资源利用率与RAC用户相比:腹部计算断层扫描更频繁(65.7%,P <0.001),加上多项专业咨询,更频繁的医院入院(P < 0.001),更高的类固醇引发(P <0.001)。每位患者诊断程序和服务的平均医疗成本估计为403美元,而1885年CAD比较所有RAC和ED访问。结论通过促进对IBD特定医疗,优化资源利用率的更容易获得改善患者护理的RAC改善的患者护理,并有助于避免访问和随后的住院治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号