首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Assessment of predictive validity and feasibility of Edmonton Frail Scale in identifying postoperative complications among elderly patients: a prospective observational study
【24h】

Assessment of predictive validity and feasibility of Edmonton Frail Scale in identifying postoperative complications among elderly patients: a prospective observational study

机译:评估Edmonton Freail规模的预测有效性和可行性在鉴定老年患者术后并发症中的术语:预期观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Frailty is defined as diminished physiological reserve predisposing one to adverse outcomes when exposed to stressors. Currently, there is no standardized Frail assessment tool used perioperatively. Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), which is validated for use by non-geriatricians and in selected surgical populations, is a candidate for this role. However, little evaluation of its use has been carried out in the Asian populations so far.?This is a prospective observational study done among patients aged 70?years and above attended Preoperative Assessment Clinic (PAC) in Singapore General Hospital prior to major abdominal surgery from December 2017 to September 2018. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) were used to assess their postoperative morbidity respectively. Patient’s acceptability of EFS was measured using the QQ-10 questionnaire and the inter-rater reliability of EFS was assessed by Kappa statistics and Bland Altman plot. The primary aim of this study is to assess if frailty measured by EFS is predictive of postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. We also aim to assess the feasibility of implementing EFS as a standard tool in the outpatient preoperative assessment clinic setting. EFS score was found to be a significant predictor of postoperative morbidity. (OR 1.35, p??0.001) Each point increase in EFS score was associated with a 3 point increase in CCI score. (Coefficient b 2.944, p??0.001) EFS score more than 4 has a fair predictability of both early and 30-day postoperative complications. Feasibility study demonstrated an overall acceptance of the EFS among our patients with good inter-rater agreement.
机译:脆弱被定义为在暴露于压力源时缩短生理储备减少了一个到不利的结果。目前,无围手术期使用标准化的虚线评估工具。 Edmonton虚线(EFS)被验证为非Geriricians和选定的外科人群,是这一角色的候选人。然而,到目前为止,亚洲人口中已经在亚洲人群中进行了很少的评估.?This是70岁以上70岁及以上的患者术前术前评估诊所(PAC)在主要腹部手术前参加了术前评估诊所(PAC)的前瞻性观察研究从2017年12月到2018年9月。综合并发症指数(CCI)和术后发病率调查(POMS)分别用于评估其术后发病率。使用QQ-10调查问卷测量患者对EFS的可接受性,Kappa统计和Bland Altman Plot评估EFS的帧间间可靠性。本研究的主要目的是评估EFS测量的脆弱是否可预测接受选修主要腹部手术的老年患者的术后并发症。我们还旨在评估门诊术前评估诊所环境中实施EFS作为标准工具的可行性。发现EFS得分是术后发病率的重要预测因子。 (或1.35,p?<0.001)EFS评分的每个点增加与CCI评分的3点增加相关。 (系数B 2.944,P?<0.001)EFS得分超过4个具有早期和30天术后并发症的公平可预测性。可行性研究表明,我们患有良好的税率协议中的EFS的全面接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号