...
首页> 外文期刊>E3S Web of Conferences >Comparison of evacuation methods used in the Netherlands and the USACE Dam and Levee Safety Programs for the Natomas Basin (CA)
【24h】

Comparison of evacuation methods used in the Netherlands and the USACE Dam and Levee Safety Programs for the Natomas Basin (CA)

机译:荷兰和浮出水坝和堤防盆地(CA)的疏散方法比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Both in the USA and in the Netherlands, extensive studies on approaches for identifying flood risks (the combination of levee failure probabilities and consequences) are ongoing. A related topic concerns evacuation and emergency management (EEM). The magnitude of life loss is directly influenced by the effectiveness of EEM. Different models can be used to define the effectiveness of evacuation. The main objective of this study is to compare Dutch and American methods for evacuation as part of flood risk management strategies for a number of case studies in the US. A second, additional objective is to explore how approaches for EEM that have been recently developed in the Netherlands, can be applied in the United States. This research shows the benefits and limitations for the application of different types of models. This research contributes to the improvement of methods for emergency management, in the Netherlands, the US and other countries.
机译:在美国和荷兰,都是关于识别洪水风险的途径的广泛研究(堤防失败概率和后果的结合)正在进行中。相关主题涉及疏散和紧急管理(EEM)。寿命损失的大小直接受到EEM的有效性的影响。不同的模型可用于定义疏散的有效性。本研究的主要目标是将荷兰和美国方法疏散,作为美国案例研究的洪水风险管理策略的一部分。第二个,额外目标是探讨最近在荷兰开发的EEM方法,可在美国应用。本研究表明了应用不同类型模型的益处和限制。这项研究有助于改善紧急管理方法,荷兰,美国和其他国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号