首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >Imaging of Corneal Neovascularization: Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescence Angiography
【24h】

Imaging of Corneal Neovascularization: Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescence Angiography

机译:角膜新生血管的成像:光学相干断层造影血管造影和荧光血管造影

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) for the assessment of corneal neovascularization (CoNV). Methods: Patients with CoNV extending at least 3 mm into the cornea were included. All patients underwent corneal imaging at the same visit. Images were recorded using the AngioVue OCTA system (Optovue, Inc.) with the long corneal adaptor module (CAM-L). ICGA images were recorded with fluorescent filters using the Heidelberg system (HRA2 Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope; Heidelberg Engineering). Images were graded for quality by two independent observers. Vessel parameters: area, number, diameter, branch and end points, and tortuosity, were compared between devices. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess differences between parameters. Results: Fifteen patients with CoNV predominantly associated with microbial keratitis were included. Mean subjective image quality score was better for ICGA (3.3 ?± 0.9) than for OCTA (2.1 ?± 1.2, P = 0.002), with almost perfect interobserver agreement for ICGA images (?o = 0.83) and substantial agreement for OCTA images (?o = 0.69). Agreement of grading of all investigated vessel parameters between ICGA and OCT images was slight to moderate, with significant differences found for vessel diameter (a??8.98 ??m, P = 0.01, 95% limits of agreement [LOA]: a??15.89 to a??2.07), number of branch (25.93, P = 0.09, 95% LOA: a??4.31 to 56.17), and terminal points (49, P = 0.05, 95% LOA: 0.78 to 97.22). Conclusion: Compared with ICGA, current OCTA systems are less precise in capturing small vessels in CoNV complexes, and validation studies are needed for OCTA segmentation software. OCTA, however, complements ICGA by providing evidence of red blood cell flow, which together with depth information, may be helpful when planning treatment of CoNV.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较光学相干断层造影血管造影(OctA)和吲哚菁绿色血管造影(ICGA),用于评估角膜新生血管(CONV)。方法:包括Conv延伸至少3mm的患者入角膜。所有患者都在同一访问中接受了角膜成像。使用长角膜适配器模块(CAM-L)使用Angiovue Octa System(Optiovue,Inc。)记录图像。使用Heidelberg System(HRA2扫描激光眼镜镜;海德堡工程)用荧光滤光片记录ICGA图像。两个独立观察员的图像分级为质量。船舶参数:在设备之间比较面积,数量,直径,分支和终点,以及曲折。 Bland-Altman情节用于评估参数之间的差异。结果:包括主要与微生物角膜炎主要相关的十五名患者。 ICGA(3.3?±0.9)比Octa(2.1?±1.2,p = 0.002)更好,几乎完美的ICGA图像(a = 0.83)和八卦图像的大量协议( ?o = 0.69)。 ICGA和OCT图像之间所有调查血管参数的分级吻合略有中度,血管直径差异显着差异(a ?? 8.98 ?? m,p = 0.01,95%的协议限制[loa]:a ?? 15.89至a ?? 2.07),分支数量(25.93,p = 0.09,95%loa:a?4.31至56.17),终点点(49,p = 0.05,95%loa:0.78至97.22)。结论:与ICGA相比,在捕获Conv复合物中的小血管时,目前的OctA系统的精确性较低,八锡分段软件需要验证研究。然而,OctA通过提供红细胞流量的证据来补充ICGA,其中与深度信息一起,在规划对Conv的治疗时可能会有所帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号