首页> 外文期刊>International journal of infectious diseases : >Fidaxomicin versus metronidazole, vancomycin and their combination for initial episode, first recurrence and severe Clostridioides difficile infection — An observational cohort study
【24h】

Fidaxomicin versus metronidazole, vancomycin and their combination for initial episode, first recurrence and severe Clostridioides difficile infection — An observational cohort study

机译:Fidaxomicin与甲硝唑,万古霉素及其对初始发作的组合,首次复发和严重的梭氧化钛酸纤维梭菌感染 - 一种观察队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) with regard to the CDI episode number and disease severity. Methods An observation cohort study included 271 CDI patients hospitalised between 2013–2016. Univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between patients’ clinical outcome (sustained clinical cure or recurrence) in a 60-day follow-up and the antibiotic regimen used (oral metronidazole, oral vancomycin, combination of oral vancomycin and metronidazole, oral fidaxomicin). Subgroup analyses, based on CDI episode number and severity, were performed. Results In the overall population, fidaxomicin was superior to metronidazole, vancomycin or their combination, for a sustained clinical response and in the prevention of recurrent CDI (rCDI). In the subgroup analyses, fidaxomicin was superior to vancomycin or metronidazole for a sustained clinical response and in the prevention of rCDI in the initial episode, first recurrence and non-severe cases. In the oral treatment of severe CDI, fidaxomicin had a similar treatment outcome to vancomycin and none of the antibiotic treatments were superior in the prevention of rCDI. Fidaxomicin, vancomycin, or a combination of metronidazole and vancomycin, had similar outcomes for sustained clinical response and prevention of rCDI in patients with multiple rCDI. Conclusion Fidaxomicin was superior to metronidazole or vancomycin for the treatment of the initial episode, first recurrence, and non-severe CDI.
机译:目的,我们旨在评估不同抗生素方案对CDI发作号和疾病严重程度治疗梭菌偶氮感染(CDI)的疗效。方法观察队列研究包括271例在2013 - 2016年间住院的CDI患者。单变量逻辑回归用于评估患者临床结果(持续临床治愈或复发)之间的关联(持续临床治疗或复发)在使用的60天随访和使用的抗生素方案(口服甲硝唑,口服万古霉素,口服万古霉素和甲硝唑组合,口服FIDAXomicin )。基于CDI集发作号和严重性进行子组分析。导致整体人口,Fidaxomicin优于甲硝唑,万古霉素或其组合,用于持续临床反应和预防复发CDI(RCDI)。在亚组分析中,Fidaxomicin优于万古霉素或甲硝唑,用于持续临床反应,并在初始发作中预防RCDI,首次复发和非严重病例。在严重CDI的口腔治疗中,Fidaxomicin对万古霉素具有类似的治疗结果,并且没有抗生素治疗在预防RCDI方面是优异的。 Fidaxomicin,万古霉素或甲硝唑和万古霉素的组合,具有类似的临床响应和预防患者患者患者的持续临床反应和预防患者。结论Fidaxomicin优于甲硝唑或万古霉素,用于治疗初始发作,首次复发和非严重CDI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号