首页> 外文期刊>International journal of infectious diseases : >Efficacy and safety of the regimens containing tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in fixed-dose single-tablet regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of the regimens containing tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in fixed-dose single-tablet regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:含有Tenofovir Alafenamide的方案的疗效和安全性与固定剂单片中的替诺福韦毒素富马酸盐进行初始治疗HIV-1感染:随机对照试验的META分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) can cause renal and bone toxicity, which is associated with high plasma tenofovir concentrations in antiretroviral treatment of HIV-1 infected patients. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a novel tenofovir prodrug with a 90% reduction in plasma tenofovir concentrations. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of a TAF-containing combination regimen versus a TDF-containing fixed-dose single-tablet regimen in the antiretroviral-treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Trial Registry, from January 2001 to July 2019, using relevant keywords. Available data were extracted from eligible randomized trials (RCTs) and pooled as risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) in a meta-analysis model using Stata/SE. Results We included seven eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 6269 participants. Patients who were antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 on both the TAF-containing regimens and the TDF-containing regimens had similar virologic suppression effects (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00–1.04; p 0.05) at week 24 (93.99% vs. 94.20%), week 48 (90.71% vs. 89.54%), and week 96 (86.16% vs. 84.80%). Both groups had no significant improvements in CD4 cell count for the naive patients during 48 weeks of therapy (SMD, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.16; p 0.05). Both treatments were safe and well-tolerated, and most adverse events were similar as mild to moderate in severity. Moreover, compared with the TDF-containing regimens, the TAF-containing regimens in patients had significantly smaller reductions in both hip (RR, 0.33; 95CI, 0.29-0.39; p 0.05) and spine (RR, 0.58; 95CI, 0.51–0.65; p 0.05). Additionally, the TAF-containing regimens in patients had significantly fewer increases for renal events than those of the TDF-containing regimens through 48 weeks (0.31; 95% CI, 0.18–0.55; p 0.05). Conclusions Our meta-analysis indicated that efficacy, safety, and tolerability of TAF-containing regimens were non-inferior in fixed-dose single-tablet regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. Furthermore, compared with those receiving the TDF-containing regimens, patients on the TAF-containing regimens had significant advantages in renal function, bone parameters, and lipid profile for the naive patients.
机译:背景技术Tenofovir Disoproxil富马酸莫酸(TDF)可引起肾和骨毒性,这与HIV-1受感染患者的抗逆转录病毒治疗中的高血浆胞多夫洛血症浓度有关。 Tenofovir Alafenamide(TAF)是一种新型替诺夫沃血虫前药,其血浆Tenovir浓度降低90%。我们旨在评估含TAF的组合方案的非自效性与抗逆转录病毒治疗 - 幼稚的HIV-1感染患者中的含TDF的固定剂单片方案。方法使用相关的关键词,我们在2001年1月至2019年7月搜索了PubMed,Embase,Science,Cochrane试验登记处搜索了Cochrane试验登记处。从符合条件的随机试验(RCT)中提取可用数据,并在使用STATA / SE的META分析模型中汇集为风险比(RRS)或标准化平均差异(SMDS)。结果我们包括七项合格随机对照试验(RCT),共有6269名参与者。含有TAF的方案和TDF方案的抗逆转录病毒 - 天真成年人的患者具有类似的病毒学抑制效应(RR,1.02; 95%CI,1.00-1.04; P> 0.05)( 93.99%与94.20%),第48周(90.71%与89.54%)和第96周(86.16%vs.8.80%)。在治疗48周的幼稚患者中,两组对幼稚患者的CD4细胞计数没有显着改善(SMD,0.09; 95%CI,0.01至0.16; P <0.05)。两种治疗是安全且耐受性的,并且大多数不良事件与严重程度的轻度相似。此外,与含TDF的方案相比,患者的含TAF方案在髋部(RR,0.33; 95CI,0.29-0.39; P <0.05)和脊柱中的减少明显较小(RR,0.58; 95ci,0.51- 0.65; P <0.05)。另外,患者的含TAF的方案显着较少,肾脏事件的增加比含TDF的方案到48周(0.31; 95%CI,0.18-0.55; P <0.05)。结论我们的META分析表明,含TAF方案的疗效,安全性和可耐受性在固定剂单片中的非较差,用于初始治疗HIV-1感染。此外,与接受含TDF方案的那些相比,含TAF方案的患者在危险患者的肾功能,骨参数和脂质曲线中具有显着的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号