...
首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Thirty-Day Outcomes From Standalone Minimally Invasive Surgery-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Patients in an Ambulatory Surgery Center vs. Hospital Setting
【24h】

Thirty-Day Outcomes From Standalone Minimally Invasive Surgery-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Patients in an Ambulatory Surgery Center vs. Hospital Setting

机译:独立微创外科手术 - 矫形器腰椎胸椎椎体椎体椎体椎体互连患者的三十天成果与医院设置

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives We sought to evaluate differences in perioperative baseline characteristics, operative efficiency, and 30-day safety events for patients undergoing standalone minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in a hospital versus an ambulatory surgery center (ASC). Methods Patients were retrospectively identified and sequentially enrolled from the office records of a single, community neurosurgeon. Records for the first 50 qualifying patients in the hospital and ASC cohorts were retrieved. Variables collected included: baseline demographic and health status, operative safety (intra-op complications)?and efficiency (operative time, fluoroscopy time, etc.), and 30-day post-operative safety (emergency room visits, re-admission, and re-operation). Results At baseline, hospital and ASC patients were equivalent in gender distribution, BMI, and pre-operative narcotic use. Statistically significant differences were found in age and comorbidity burden (ASA status and Charleson Comorbidity Index); p 0.0001, p = 0.0039, and p 0.001 respectively. The only significant difference in construct type between hospital and ASC patients was the proportion of one- versus two-level fusions; all two-level fusions were performed in the hospital group. There were no differences in operative time, need for transfusions, or iatrogenic complications. There were also no differences between the groups in 30-day events of ER visits, re-admission, re-operation, or post-operative narcotic refill use. The length of stay was significantly different between the ASC and hospital settings (p 0.0001). Conclusions As expected, ASC patients were younger and relatively healthier compared to their hospital counterparts. Thirty-day safety events of ER visits, re-admission, re-operation, and narcotic refill utilization were representative of population norms. Patients with standalone, expandable MIS-TLIF underwent efficient operative procedures and experienced minimal 30-day complications independent of their operative status. ASC patients had the added benefit of significantly reduced length of stay over their hospital counterparts. Given the equivalency of the 30-day post-operative course for both patient cohorts, a substantial reduction in economic burden is likely for the ASC patients.
机译:我们试图评估围手术期基线特征,手术效率和30天的安全事件的差异,为在医院的独立微创手术 - 横向腰椎腰椎胸壁椎体椎体胸壁椎体椎体椎体椎体椎间椎体(MIS-TLIF)与动态手术中心(ASC)进行差异。方法回顾性鉴定患者,并顺序地从单一社区神经外科的办公室记录中注册。检索到医院和ASC队列中的前50名合格患者的记录。收集的变量包括:基线人口统计和健康状况,手术安全(op-op-oper-offeration,透明时间等),以及30天的手术后安全性(急诊室访问,重新入场,和重新运行)。结果在基线,医院和ASC患者的性别分配,BMI和术前的麻醉用途等同于。在年龄和合并症负担(ASA状态和Charleson合并症指数)中发现了统计上显着的差异; P <0.0001,P = 0.0039和P <0.001分别。医院和ASC患者之间的构建体类型唯一的巨大差异是双层融合的比例;所有两级融合都在医院组进行。手术时间没有差异,需要输血或性病并发症。在ER访问,重新入场,重新运行或操作后的麻醉refill使用中,在30天的事件中也没有差异。 ASC和医院环境之间的逗留时间显着不同(P <0.0001)。与预期的结论如预期,与医院同行相比,ASC患者较年轻,更健康。 er访问,重新入场,重新运行和麻醉补充利用的30天安全事件均代表人口规范。独立,可扩展的MIS-TLIF患者接受了高效的手术程序,并且具有历史最小的30天并发症,无论是他们的手术状态。 ASC患者的额外福利在其医院同行中持续减少。鉴于两天的患者队列的30天术后课程的等效性,ASC患者的经济负担的大幅减少可能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号