...
首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Is Physiologic Stress Test with Imaging Comparable to Anatomic Examination of Coronary Arteries by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Investigate Coronary Artery Disease? – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Is Physiologic Stress Test with Imaging Comparable to Anatomic Examination of Coronary Arteries by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Investigate Coronary Artery Disease? – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:是否与冠状动脉造影血管造影的冠状动脉造影患者对冠状动脉的解剖检查进行了成像,调查冠状动脉疾病? - 系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Objective Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive diagnostic modality that remains underutilized compared to functional stress testing (ST) for investigating coronary artery disease (CAD). Several patients are misdiagnosed with noncardiac chest pain (CP) that eventually die from a cardiovascular event in subsequent years. We compared CCTA?to ST?to investigate CP. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1, 2007?to July 1, 2018?for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CCTA to ST in patients who presented with acute or stable CP. We used Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program] Version 5.3 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) for review and analysis. Results We included 16 RCTs enrolling 21,210 patients; there were more patients with hyperlipidemia and older patients in the ST arm compared to the CCTA arm. There was no difference in mortality: 103 in the CCTA arm vs. 110 in the ST arm (risk ratio [RR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71-1.21, P = .58, and I 2 = 0%). A significant reduction was seen in myocardial infarctions (MIs) after CCTA compared to ST: 115 vs. 156 (RR = 0.71, CI = 0.56-0.91, P .006, I 2 =0%). On subgroup analysis, the CCTA arm had fewer MIs vs. the ST with imaging subgroup (RR = 0.70, CI = 0.54-0.89, P = .004, I 2 = 0%) and stable CP subgroup (RR = 0.66, CI = 0.50-0.88, P = .004, I 2 = 0%). The CCTA arm showed significantly higher invasive coronary angiograms and revascularizations and significantly reduced follow-up testing and recurrent hospital visits. A trend towards increased unstable anginas was seen in the CCTA arm. Conclusions Our analysis showed a significant reduction in downstream MIs, hospital visits, and follow-up testing when CCTA is used to investigate CAD with no difference in mortality.
机译:客观冠状动脉冠状动脉造影血管造影(CCTA)是一种非侵入性诊断模态,其与用于研究冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的功能压力测试(ST)相比仍未化。几名患者被误诊,具有非心动胸痛(CP),最终在随后的年度死于心血管事件。我们比较CCTA?到ST?调查CP。方法搜索了2007年1月1日的Medline,PubMed,Cochrane图书馆和Embase的研究?到2018年7月1日?对于随机对照试验(RCT)比较患有急性或稳定CP的患者的CCTA至ST。我们使用审核经理(Revman)[计算机程序]版本5.3(哥本哈根:北欧Cochrane Center,Cochrane Collaboration,2014),用于审查和分析。结果我们还包括16名RCT,注册了21,210名患者;与CCTA ARM相比,ST ARM中有更多患有高脂血症和老年患者的患者。死亡率没有差异:103在CCTA臂与110中的ST臂(风险比[RR] = 0.93,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.71-1.21,P = .58,以及I 2 = 0 %)。 CCTA与ST:115对156相比(RR = 0.71,CI = 0.56-0.91,P <.006,I 2 = 0%),在CCTA后,在心肌梗塞(MIS)中观察到显着的减少。在亚组分析中,CCTA臂具有较少的MIS与成像子组(RR = 0.70,CI = 0.54-0.89,P = .004,I 2 = 0%)和稳定的CP子组(RR = 0.66,CI = 0.50-0.88,p = .004,i 2 = 0%)。 CCTA ARM显示出显着更高的侵入性冠状动脉血管造影和血运重建,并显着降低了后续测试和经常性医院访问。在CCTA ARM中看到了一种增加不稳定的anginas的趋势。结论我们的分析表明,当CCTA用于调查CAD时,下游MIS,医院访问和随访测试显着降低了下游MIS,医院访问和后续测试,而死亡率没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号