...
首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Incidence and Implication of Coronary Artery Calcium on Non-gated Chest Computed Tomography Scans: A Large Observational Cohort
【24h】

Incidence and Implication of Coronary Artery Calcium on Non-gated Chest Computed Tomography Scans: A Large Observational Cohort

机译:冠状动脉钙对非门控胸部计算断层扫描扫描的发病率和含义:大型观察队列

获取原文

摘要

Introduction Coronary artery calcification (CAC) scoring is typically performed utilizing non-contrast, electrocardiogram- (ECG) gated CT and offers an estimation of cardiovascular (CV) prognosis and risk stratification beyond previously established cardiac risk factors.?Coronary calcification can also be assessed during non-gated chest CT, which is significant given the recent recommendations for lung cancer screening by low-dose CT. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 4,953 non-contrast chest CT scans in a single, closed referral tertiary military treatment facility over an 18-month period. Baseline CV outcomes to include myocardial infarction (MI), cerebral vascular accidents (CVA), revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), death, or a composite of all major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and baseline CV risk factors were abstracted from an electronic medical record (EMR) review. Results CAC was seen in 3,119 (63%) patients while 1,834 (27%) were without CAC.?All traditional CV risk factors were more commonly observed in patients with CAC.?Unadjusted odds of composite MACE, death, MI, coronary revascularization, and CVA?between presence and absence of CAC were as follows: 3.55 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.60-4.86, p: 0.0001]; 2.98 (95% CI: 2.02-4.40, p: 0.0001); 24.42 (95% CI: 3.36-177.6, p: 0.0001); 5.64 (95% CI: 2.58-12.32, p: 0.0001); and 2.32 (95% CI: 1.19-4.50, p: 0.0104), respectively.?However, after adjusting for baseline risk factors, CAC on non-gated CT was associated only with an increased observed rate of MI (aOR: 38.1, 95% CI: 4.57-318.2, p: 0.0001) and revascularization (aOR: 5.58, 95% CI: 2.22-14.0, p; 0.0003). Conclusions Findings of CAC on non-gated chest CT may help to recognize patients who are?at increased risk of MI and revascularization. Given the expected increase in chest CT utilization among?former smokers for lung cancer screening, observed CAC should be reported to ordering providers in order to identify patients at increased risk of these important outcomes.
机译:介绍冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分通常使用非对比度,心电图(ECG)门控CT,并提供了心血管(CV)预后和风险分层之外的估计,超出了先前建立的心脏风险因素.?Coronary钙化也可以评估在非门控胸CT期间,鉴于最近通过低剂量CT筛选肺癌筛选的建议是显着的。方法在18个月内,我们回顾性地审查了4,953名非对比胸CT扫描,在一个封闭的推荐三级军事治疗设施中。基线CV结果包括心肌梗死(MI),脑血管事故(CVA),血运重建与经皮冠状动脉干预(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路接枝(CABG),死亡或所有主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的复合物,和基线CV风险因素从电子医疗记录(EMR)审查中抽象出来。结果CAC在3,119名(63%)患者中观察,而1,834(27%)没有CAC。CAC的患者更常见的CAC危险因素是复合术术,死亡,MI,冠状动脉血运重建的患者中更常见的。和CVA?在CAC的存在和不存在之间如下:3.55 [95%置信区间(CI):2.60-4.86,P:<0.0001]; 2.98(95%CI:2.02-4.40,P:<0.0001); 24.42(95%CI:3.36-177.6,P:<0.0001); 5.64(95%CI:2.58-12.32,P:<0.0001); 2.32(95%CI:1.19-4.50,P:0.0104),在调整基线风险因素后,CAC对非门控CT仅随着MI的观察率增加而相关的(AOR:38.1,95 %CI:4.57-318.2,P:<0.0001)和血运重建(AOR:5.58,95%CI:2.22-14.0,P; 0.0003)。结论CAC对非门控胸部CT的结果可能有助于识别患者患者增加MI和血运重建的风险。鉴于胸部CT利用率的预期增加?前吸烟者用于肺癌筛查,应据报告CAC向订购提供商报告,以识别患者,以增加这些重要结果的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号