...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >The evaluation of Suchana, a large-scale development program to prevent chronic undernutrition in north-eastern Bangladesh
【24h】

The evaluation of Suchana, a large-scale development program to prevent chronic undernutrition in north-eastern Bangladesh

机译:评估Suchana,这是一个预防孟加拉国东北部慢性营养不良的大规模发展方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Evidence of the impact of community-based nutrition programs is uncommon for two main reasons: the lack ofuntreated controls, and implementation does not account for the evaluation design. Suchana is a large-scale programto prevent malnutrition in children in Sylhet division, Bangladesh by improving the livelihoods and nutritionknowledge of poor and very poor households. Suchana is being implemented in 157 unions, the smallestadministrative unit of government, in two districts of Sylhet. Suchana will deliver a package of interventions to poorpeople in about 40 randomly selected new unions annually over 4 years, until all are covered. All beneficiaries willreceive the normal government nutrition services. For evaluation purposes the last 40 unions will act as a control forthe first 40 intervention unions. The remaining unions will receive the program but will not take part in the evaluation.A baseline survey was conducted in both intervention and control unions; it will be repeated after 3 years to estimatethe impact on the prevalence of stunted children and other indicators. This stepped wedge design has severaladvantages for both the implementation and evaluation of services, as well as some disadvantages. The units ofdelivery are randomized, which controls for other influences on outcomes; the program supports government servicedelivery systems, so it is replicable and scalable; and the program can be improved over time as lessons are learned.The main disadvantages are the difficulty of estimating the impact of each component of the program, and thegeographical distribution of unions, which increases program delivery costs. Stepped implementation allows a clusterrandomized trial to be achieved within a large-scale poverty alleviation program and phased-in and scaled-up over aperiod of time. This paper may encourage evaluators to consider how to estimate attributable impact by usingstepped implementation, which allows the counterfactual group eventually to be treated.
机译:有两种主要原因:基于社区的营养计划的影响的证据是罕见的两种主要原因:缺乏治疗的控制,并没有考虑评估设计。 Suchana是一项大规模的计划,防止孟加拉国在Sylhet部门的儿童中的营养不良,通过改善贫困和非常贫困的家庭的生计和营养知识。在锡洛赫的两个地区,在157个工会中,在157个工会中实施了157个工会。 Suchana将在40年内随机选择的新工会约40名贫民区提供一揽子干预措施,直到所有人都被覆盖。所有受益者都将导致正常的政府营养服务。对于评估目的,过去40个工会将作为第一个40个干预工会的控制。剩下的工会将收到该计划,但不会参加评估。在干预和控制工会中进行基线调查; 3年后重复,估计对患有儿童和其他指标的患病率的影响。这家阶梯式楔形设计具有服务和评估服务的DOURDANTES,以及一些缺点。将单位随机化,该单位为其他对结果的影响;该计划支持政府服务提供系统,因此它可复制和可扩展;随着经验教训,该计划可以随着时间的推移而得到改善。主要缺点是估计程序每个部件的影响以及工会的地球分布的难度增加,这增加了计划运输成本。步进实施允许在大规模的扶贫程序中实现群集造型试验,并在进行中逐步相位和缩放。本文可能会鼓励评估人员考虑如何通过使用STEPPED实施来估算可归解的影响,这使得反事实组最终将被治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号