...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >From long-term sickness absence to disability retirement: diagnostic and occupational class differences within the working-age Finnish population
【24h】

From long-term sickness absence to disability retirement: diagnostic and occupational class differences within the working-age Finnish population

机译:从长期疾病缺勤到残疾退休:工作年龄芬兰人口中的诊断和职业阶层差异

获取原文
           

摘要

It is well documented that sickness absence is strongly associated with disability retirement. A long-term sickness absence (LTSA) in particular increases the risk of disability retirement, but little is known about the variation of this risk across diagnostic causes. Further, as occupational classes differ in their diagnostic profiles, it is likely that the role of diagnosis in the pathway from LTSA to disability retirement varies between occupational classes. We examined how LTSA of different diagnostic causes predicts all-cause disability retirement and disability retirement due to the same diagnostic group or due to some other diagnostic group than that which caused the LTSA spell in different occupational classes. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse a 70% random sample of all employed Finns aged 25–62 Finns in 2006 (N?=?1,458,288). Disability retirement was followed from 2007 to 2014. The risk of disability retirement was compared between occupational classes with at least one LTSA spell due to musculoskeletal diseases, mental disorders, respiratory diseases, or circulatory diseases and those who had no LTSA spells due to these diagnostic groups during 2005. Those who had LTSA due to musculoskeletal diseases or mental disorders transferred more often to disability retirement due to same diagnostic group, whereas those who had LTSA due to respiratory or circulatory diseases transferred more often to disability retirement due to some other diagnostic group. The largest occupational class differences in all-cause disability retirement were found among those with LTSA due to mental disorders. For men, the hazard ratios (HR) varied from HR 5.70 (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.00–6.52) in upper non-manual employees to 2.70 (95% CI 2.50–2.92) in manual workers. For women, the corresponding HRs were 3.74 (95% CI 3.37–4.14) in upper non-manual employees and 2.32 (95% 2.17–2.50) in manual workers. The association between LTSA and disability retirement varies between diagnostic groups, and the strength of this association further depends on the person’s occupational class and gender.
机译:有条件有很好的记录,疾病缺席与残疾退休有关。特别是长期疾病(LTSA)特别提高残疾退休的风险,但对诊断原因的这种风险的变化很少有人少见。此外,随着职业课程在其诊断谱中不同,诊断在LTSA途径中的作用可能在职业课程之间变化。我们检查了不同诊断原因的LTSA如何预测由于与不同职业课程中LTSA咒语导致LTSA拼写的其他诊断群体引起的所有导致残疾退休和残疾退休。 Cox比例危害模型用于分析2006年25-62芬氏植物的所有使用的芬兰人的70%随机样品(n?= 1,458,288)。遵循2007年至2014年的残疾退休。在职业课程之间比较残疾退休的风险,由于肌肉骨骼疾病,精神障碍,呼吸系统疾病或循环疾病,并且由于这些诊断而没有LTSA法术的人。 2005年期间的群体。由于肌肉骨骼疾病或精神障碍因诊断组而更频繁地转移到肌肉骨骼疾病或精神障碍的人,而由于一些其他诊断组,由于呼吸或循环疾病导致的LTSA的人更常见于残疾退休者。由于精神障碍,在LTSA中发现了全导致残疾退休的最大职业阶级差异。对于男性,危险比(HR)在上部非手动员工中的HR 5.70(95%置信区间(CI)5.00-6.52)变化至2.70(95%CI 2.50-2.92)。对于女性而言,相应的HRS在上部非手动员工中为3.74(95%CI 3.37-4.14),2.32(95%2.17-2.50)在体力工人中。 LTSA与残疾退休之间的关联在诊断群体之间变化,而本协会的实力进一步取决于该人的职业阶层和性别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号