首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Time spent cycling, walking, running, standing and sedentary: a cross-sectional analysis of accelerometer-data from 1670 adults in the Copenhagen City Heart Study
【24h】

Time spent cycling, walking, running, standing and sedentary: a cross-sectional analysis of accelerometer-data from 1670 adults in the Copenhagen City Heart Study

机译:花费骑自行车,行走,跑步,站立和久坐:哥本哈根市心脏研究中1670名成人的加速度计数据横截面分析

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Information about how much time adults spend cycling, walking and running can be used for planning and evaluating initiatives for active, healthy societies. The objectives of this study were?to describe how much time adult Copenhageners cycle, walk, run, stand and spend sedentary using accelerometers, and to?describe differences between population groups.METHODS:In the fifth examination of the Copenhagen City Heart Study, 2335 individuals gave consent to wear accelerometers (skin-attached; right thigh and iliac crest; 24?h/day, 7 consecutive days) of which 1670 fulfilled our inclusion criteria (≥16?h/day for ≥5?days; median wear time: 23.8?h/day). Daily time spent cycling, walking, running, standing and sedentary was derived from accelerometer-based data using the Acti4 software, and differences between sex, age groups, level of education and BMI were investigated using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests.RESULTS:Among those cycling (61%), the median cycling time was 8.3?min/day. The median time walking, running, standing and sedentary was 82.6, 0.1, 182.5 and 579.1?min/day, respectively. About 88% walked fast (i.e., ≥100 steps/min) ≥30?min/day. The shortest duration and lowest prevalence of cycling, walking and running were found among older individuals, those with a low level of education, and individuals being overweight or obese.CONCLUSIONS:We found a long duration and high prevalence of cycling and walking, but also that?many adult Copenhageners spent?much time sedentary. Population groups with low participation in physical activities such as cycling and walking should be targeted in future initiatives towards an active, healthy society.
机译:背景:有关成年人花费骑自行车,散步和运行的信息可用于规划和评估积极健康的社会的举措。这项研究的目标是描述成人哥本哈根人循环,步行,运行,支架和使用加速度计的封闭时间,以及描述人口群体之间的差异。方法:在哥本哈根市的第五次考试中,2335个人同意佩戴加速度计(皮肤附着;右大腿和髂嵴; 24?H /日,连续7天,连续7天),其中1670次满足我们的纳入标准(≥16?H / Day≥5?天;中位磨损时间:23.8?H /日)。每日时间花费骑自行车,行走,跑步,站立和久坐不动来自使用Acti4软件来源于加速度计的数据,使用Kruskal-Wallis等级Sum Tests调查了性别,年龄组,教育水平和BMI之间的差异。结果:中间那些循环(61%),中位数循环时间为8.3?最小/天。中位时间行走,跑步,站立和久坐不动度为82.6,0.1,182.5和579.1分别为579.1次/天。大约88%的人走得快速(即≥100步/分钟)≥30?最小/天。在老年人中发现了最短的持续时间和最低循环,骑行和跑步,受教育水平低的人和个人超重或肥胖的人。结论:我们发现骑自行车和行走的持续时间和高度普及,还有那个?许多成年哥本哈根人花了很多时间久坐。应对骑自行车和行走等体育活动的人口群体应以积极,健康的社会的未来举措为目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号