首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Simple and rationale-providing SMS reminders to promote accelerometer use: a within-trial randomised trial comparing persuasive messages
【24h】

Simple and rationale-providing SMS reminders to promote accelerometer use: a within-trial randomised trial comparing persuasive messages

机译:简单和理由提供短信提醒促进加速度计使用:试验内的随机试验比较有说服力的信息

获取原文
           

摘要

Literature on persuasion suggests compliance increases when requests are accompanied with a reason (i.e. the "because-heuristic"). The reliability of outcomes in physical activity research is dependent on sufficient accelerometer wear-time. This study tested whether SMS reminders-especially those that provided a rationale-are associated with increased accelerometer wear-time. We conducted a within-trial partially randomised controlled trial during baseline data collection in a school-based physical activity intervention trial. Of 375 participants (mean age?=?18.1), 280 (75%) opted to receive daily SMS reminders to wear their accelerometers. These 280 participants were then randomised to receive either succinct reminders or reminders including a rationale. Data was analyzed across groups using both frequentist and Bayesian methods. No differences in total accelerometer wear minutes were detected between the succinct reminder group (Mdn?=?4909, IQR?=?3429-5857) and the rationale group (Mdn?=?4808, IQR?=?3571-5743); W?=?8860, p?=?0.65, CI95?=?-?280.90-447.20. Similarly, we found no differences in wear time between participants receiving SMS reminders (Mdn?=?4859, IQR?=?3527-5808) and those not receiving them (Mdn?=?5067, IQR?=?3201-5885); W?=?10,642.5, p?=?0.77, CI95?=?-?424.20-305.30. Bayesian ANOVA favored a model of equal weartime means, over one of unequal means, by a Bayes Factor of 12.05. Accumulated days of valid accelerometer wear data did not differ either. Equivalence testing indicated rejection of effects more extreme than a Cohen's d (standardised mean difference) of ±~0.3. This study casts doubt on the effectiveness of using the because-heuristic via SMS messaging, to promote accelerometer wear time among youth. The because-heuristic might be limited to face-to-face communication and situations where no intention for or commitment to the behavior has yet been made. Other explanations for null effects include non-reading of messages, and reminder messages undermining the self-reminding strategies which would occur naturally in the absence of reminders. DRKS DRKS00007721 . Registered 14.04.2015. Retrospectively registered.
机译:说服的文献表明,当请求伴随着一个原因时,遵守情况增加(即“因为 - 启发式”)。身体活动研究中结果的可靠性取决于足够的加速度计磨损时间。本研究测试了短信是否提醒 - 特别是那些提供理由 - 与增加的加速度计磨损时间相关。在基于学校的身体活动干预审判中,我们在基线数据收集期间进行了一项试验部分随机对照试验。 375名参与者(平均年龄?=?18.1),280(75%)选择接收日常短信提醒以佩戴加速度计。然后随机将这280名参与者随机接受包括理由的简洁提醒或提醒。使用频繁频率和贝叶斯方法在组中分析数据。在简洁的提醒组(MDN?= 4909,IQR?= 3429-5857)和理论组之间没有检测到总加速度计磨损分钟的差异(MDN?=?4808,IQR?=?3571-5743); w?=?8860,p?=?0.65,ci95?=? - ?280.90-447.20。同样,我们发现接受短信提醒的参与者之间的磨损时间没有差异(MDN?=?4859,IQR?= 3527-5808)和未接收的人(MDN?=?5067,IQR?=?3201- 5885); w?=?10,642.5,p?=?0.77,ci95?=? - ?424.20-305.30。 Bayesian Anova赞成了一个平等的磨损时间意味着的模型,通过12.05的贝叶因子来超过一个不平等的手段。有效加速度计磨损数据的累计日子也没有差异。等效测试表明抑制效果比COHEN的D(标准化平均差异)±〜0.3的效果更偏差。本研究对使用SMS消息传递的效果来说,促进了青年之间的加速度计磨损时间。由于启发式可能仅限于面对面的通信和情况,在没有意图或致力于行为的情况。空效应的其他解释包括非读取消息,提醒信息破坏自我提醒策略,在没有提醒的情况下将自然发生。 DRKS DRKS00007721。注册14.04.2015。回顾性地注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号