首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from South Korea
【24h】

Does guideline non-adherence result in worse clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women?: result of an institution database from South Korea

机译:指南非依从性是否导致初生妇女中的激素受体阳性和海绵体阳性转移性乳腺癌的临床结果更差?:来自韩国的机构数据库的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundBreast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide and the leading cause of cancer death in women [1, 2]. Hormone receptor positive (HR-positive) subtype represents the majority of the patients with breast cancer (60–75%) [3], and early stage HR-positive patients receive adjuvant endocrine therapy after curative aim of treatment. Nevertheless, about 30% of early HR-positive breast cancer develops into metastatic disease over time, and de novo metastatic breast cancer represents about 5–10% of all breast cancer [4]. Despite the advancement in breast cancer management, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) continues to portend poor prognosis with 5-year survival rate of just 25% [2].Endocrine therapy is the preferred option for the treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC, exclusive of visceral crisis or endocrine resistance [5]. So far, the consensus has been that initial palliative chemotherapy appears to be inferior to endocrine therapy in terms of efficacy and toxicity [6]. However, real-world practicing patterns differ from the guidelines with a considerable portion of patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC still receiving initial palliative chemotherapy rather than endocrine therapy, with non-adherent practice resulting in worse outcomes [7].In Asian populations, patients with breast cancer have distinct demographic characteristics compared to Western counterparts [8, 9]. The peak incidence for breast cancer is in the 40s among Asian patients, in contrast to the 60s in the United States [8]. The premenopausal patients make up about half of the whole breast cancer population in Asian countries, with approximately 10% of the patients being younger than 35?years [10, 11]. This must be understood in the context that breast cancer is known to be more aggressive and associated with poorer prognosis for premenopausal patients [12]. In this study, we observe the patterns of initial palliative treatment for premenopausal patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC and determine if nonadherence to clinical guidelines are associated with worse clinical outcomes in terms of PFS and OS in the South Korean population.
机译:Backgroundbreast癌是全世界女性最常见的癌症,妇女死亡原因[1,2]。激素受体阳性(HR阳性)亚型代表大多数乳腺癌患者(60-75%)[3],早期的HR阳性患者在治疗治疗后接受佐剂内分泌治疗。然而,大约30%的早期HR阳性乳腺癌随着时间的推移而发展到转移性疾病,并且De Novo转移性乳腺癌占所有乳腺癌的5-10%[4]。尽管乳腺癌管理的进步,转移性乳腺癌(MBC)继续预测预后差,5年生存率仅为25%[2] .Endocrine疗法是治疗HR阳性,HER2阴性的优选选择MBC,不包括内分泌危机或内分泌抵抗[5]。到目前为止,共识一直是初始姑息化疗似乎在疗效和毒性方面差不等[6]。然而,现实世界练习模式与具有相当一部分的HR阳性/ HER2阴性MBC患者的指南不同,仍然接受初始姑息性化疗而不是内分泌治疗,并且非依恋的实践导致更糟糕的结果[7]。亚洲群体,乳腺癌患者与西方同行相比具有不同的人口特征[8,9]。乳腺癌的峰值发生率是亚洲患者中40多岁,与美国60多人相比[8]。前辈患者占亚洲国家全部乳腺癌人口的一半,大约10%的患者在35岁以下?年份[10,11]。必须在乳腺癌患者更具侵袭性并且与前辈患者预后较差的情况下理解这一点[12]。在这项研究中,我们观察HR阳性/ HER2阴性MBC的前辈患者初始姑息治疗的模式,并确定不正常对审查指南的临床指南是否与韩国人口的PFS和OS方面的临床结果有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号