...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Achieving a timely diagnosis for teenagers and young adults with cancer: the ACE “too young to get cancer?” study
【24h】

Achieving a timely diagnosis for teenagers and young adults with cancer: the ACE “too young to get cancer?” study

机译:为青少年和癌症的年轻成年人及时诊断:ACE“太年轻,无法癌症?”学习

获取原文
           

摘要

Time to diagnosis (TTD) concerns teenagers and young adults (TYA) with cancer and may affect outcome. Healthcare records from 105 TYA in a regional cancer service were assessed to document events from 1st symptom to treatment start. Detailed pathway construction was possible for 104 patients and allowed a multidisciplinary panel review of each pathway with assessment of good practice and lessons for the future. 1st presentation was to primary care in 86, and 93% consulted in primary care before diagnosis. Routes to Diagnosis were 45% via urgent 2 Week Wait pathways and 38% as emergency referrals. Total Interval (time from 1st presentation to treatment start) was median 63 (range 1-559) days, varying within/between diagnoses. Patient interval (time from 1st symptom to 1st presentation) was longest for lymphoma, carcinoma and bone tumour (medians: 9, 12, 20?days). Overall, time in primary care was short (median 3, range 0-537?days) compared to secondary care (median 29, range 0-195?days) and longest for lymphoma, carcinoma, brain/CNS (medians: 10, 15, 16?days). Specialist Care interval (time from 1st specialist visit to treatment start) was longest for bone, brain/CNS, lymphoma, carcinoma (medians: 30, 33, 36, 48?days). 40% pathways were rated as showing good/best practice but 16% were less than satisfactory. Continued safety-netting/support was identified from primary care but analysis suggested opportunities for improvement in transition through secondary care. Previous reports of prolonged TTD have focused on delay in referral from primary care but this study suggests that this might be reduced by optimising management in secondary care.
机译:诊断(TTD)涉及患有癌症的青少年和年轻人(TYA),可能会影响结果。在区域癌症服务中的105个TYA的医疗保健记录被评估为从1症症状到治疗开始的文件事件。 104名患者可以进行详细的途径建设,并允许对每个路线进行多学科小组审查,并评估未来的良好实践和课程。第1次介绍为86次,93%在诊断前初级护理咨询。诊断的途径通过紧急2周等待途径为45%,38%作为紧急转诊。总间隔(从第一展示到治疗开始的时间)是中位数63(范围1-559)天,在诊断中不同。患者间隔(从第1次症状到第1展示的时间)对于淋巴瘤,癌和骨肿瘤(中位数:9,12,20?天)最长。总体而言,初级保健时间短(中位数3,0-537?天)与二次护理(中位数29,0-195?天)和淋巴瘤,癌,脑/ CNS(中位数:10,15 16?天)。专业护理间隔(从第一专业访问治疗开始的时间)是骨骼,脑/ CNS,淋巴瘤,癌(中位数:30,33,36,48?天)的最长。 40%的途径被评为显示出良好/最佳实践,但16%的态度小于令人满意的态度。从初级保健中确定了持续的安全网/支持,但分析建议通过二级护理改善过渡的机会。以前关于延长TTD的报告侧重于初级保健延迟转诊,但本研究表明,通过优化次要管理层的管理,可能会降低这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号