首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Youth Development >A Qualitative Evaluation of the 4-H Record Book in Light of the PYD Concepts: Belonging, Mastery, Independence, and Generosity
【24h】

A Qualitative Evaluation of the 4-H Record Book in Light of the PYD Concepts: Belonging, Mastery, Independence, and Generosity

机译:根据PYD概念的4-H记录书的定性评估:归属,掌握,独立和慷慨

获取原文
           

摘要

The highlights of a study of the 4-H Record Book (RB) in light of the four positive youth development (PYD) concepts: belonging, mastery, independence, and generosity are discussed in this paper. Utilizing qualitative methods we interviewed 21 participants (14 leaders, 9 recent 4-H alumni) from 9 states. Results describe the ways in which participants perceived that the RB (a) supports the four PYD concepts (e.g., “RB fosters independence through the goal setting, monitoring, and appraising process”) and (b) does not support, or should be revised to support the concept (e.g., “RB competitions may hinder mastery”). Our results support the RB as a PYD intervention but we recommend that states/counties consider these results when revising RBs. In light of concerns about age and developmental appropriateness, we suggest that the most pressing question is whether or not the traditionally formatted RB is appropriate for all 4-Hers. We encourage RB committees to engage professionals with developmental expertise (e.g., educators) in RB revisions.
机译:4-H记录书(RB)研究的亮点是四个正青年发展(PYD)概念:本文讨论了归属,掌握,独立和慷慨。利用定性方法,我们采访了来自9个州的21名参与者(14个领导人,最近的4-H校友)。结果描述了参与者认为RB(a)支持四个Pyd概念(例如,“RB循环通过目标设置,监测和评估过程”)和(B)不支持的方式,或者应该修改支持概念(例如,“RB比赛可能会阻碍掌握”)。我们的结果支持RB作为PYD干预,但我们建议各国/县在修改RBS时考虑这些结果。鉴于年龄和发育适当性的担忧,我们建议最紧迫的问题是传统格式的RB是否适合所有4-HERS。我们鼓励RB委员会在RB修订中聘请专业人士(例如,教育工作者)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号