首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering >OASIS 1: Retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types
【24h】

OASIS 1: Retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types

机译:OASIS 1:四种不同微处理器膝关型的回顾性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Microprocessor knee analyses to date have been primarily limited to microprocessor knees as a category rather than comparisons across different models. The purpose of the current analysis was to compare outcomes from four common knee models. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes was performed. Outcomes for functional mobility, quality of life, satisfaction with amputee status, and injurious falls were compared. Specific knee types represented were C-Leg (Ottobock), Orion (Blatchford), Plié (Freedom Innovations), and Rheo (?ssur). Results Outcomes from 602 individuals were included. No significant differences were noted for functional mobility (H?=?2.91, p?=?0.406) or satisfaction (H?=?4.43, p?=?0.219). For quality of life, differences existed for C-Leg versus Plié (p?=?0.010). For injurious falls, C-Leg (χ2(1,137)?=?10.99, p?
机译:介绍迄今为止的微处理器膝关节分析主要限于微处理器膝盖作为类别而不是跨不同模型的比较。目前分析的目的是比较四种共同膝盖模型的结果。方法进行临床结果的回顾性分析。功能流动性,生活质量,对截肢者身份的满意度以及有害瀑布的结果。代表的特定膝关节类型是C-LEC(Ottobock),Orion(Blatchford),Plié(自由创新)和Rheo(?SSUR)。包括602人的结果结果。功能迁移率没有显着差异(H?= 2.91,p?= 0.406)或满意度(H?= 4.43,P?= 0.219)。对于生活质量,C腿与PLIÉ存在差异(p?= 0.010)。对于有害的瀑布,C-LEC(χ2(1,137)?=?10.99,p?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号