首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Literature and Science >Review of Jessica Roberts’s “Teaching Literature and History of Medicine in the National Health Service.”
【24h】

Review of Jessica Roberts’s “Teaching Literature and History of Medicine in the National Health Service.”

机译:杰西卡罗伯茨的“国家卫生服务教学文学与医学史”。

获取原文
       

摘要

If Kathryn Strong Hansen’s method of “literature for specific purposes”(Configurations 26.3, Summer 2018) moves literature into science and engineeringfields, then Jessica Roberts pushes literature out of its comfort zone farther still.Expanding beyond the university setting entirely, Roberts demonstrates the impact ofliterary engagement in the workplace, focusing on the professional context of theUnited Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS). Roberts generously frames herarticle as a response to my Summer 2017 essay in JLS, “Teaching Literature andScience in Silicon Valley”, and I am excited to have the opportunity to continue thedialogue here. Engaging with Roberts prompts me to reread my own work with a newoutlook. Most importantly, Roberts’s positive experience as the employee of anorganization that “does expect and desire that [she] exercise [her] subject specialistknowledge” (345) – a doctorate in “nineteenth-century medicine and the periodicalpress” (346) – offers a useful corrective to my original pessimistic tendency to assumethat humanistic values would too often be corrupted by their applications in industry.
机译:如果Kathryn强大的汉森的“文献以特定目的的文献”(2018年夏天)将文学迁移到科学和工程领域,然后Jessica Roberts将文献推出其舒适区仍然存在。罗伯茨超越大学环境,罗伯茨展示了影响在工作场所的义务参与,重点关注公共王国国家卫生服务(NHS)的专业背景。罗伯茨慷慨地框架爪子作为2017年夏季JLS夏季的回应,“硅谷的文学和科技教学和科技”,我很高兴有机会在这里继续脑电图。与Roberts一起参与促使我与新途集一起重读自己的工作。最重要的是,Roberts作为变量员工的积极经验,即“确实期待和渴望[她]运动[她]主题专业知识”(345) - “十九世纪医学和期限的博士学位”(346) - 提供了一个对我原始的悲观倾向进行有用的纠正,旨在假设人文值往往会因其在行业中的应用而腐败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号