...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review

机译:非侵袭性脑刺激对中风中脑卒中中央临床疼痛强度和实验性疼痛敏感性的影响:系统综述

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic disorder resulting in pain and disability. An emerging treatment for CPSP is non-invasive brain stimulation including direct current stimulation [tDCS] and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS]. This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and quality of non-invasive brain stimulation intervention studies for CPSP. Methods: Studies were sought from three research databases published between 2007 and 2017. Studies were included if the sole intervention was non-invasive brain stimulation and the primary outcome either clinical or experimental pain intensity. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias. Results: Of 1107 articles extracted, six met eligibility criteria. Five studies found a decrease in pain intensity (p0.05) immediately and 3 weeks after rTMS or tDCS was delivered over the primary motor cortex. For experimental pain, one study found thermal pain thresholds improved for those receiving tDCS compared to sham (p0.05), while another found normalization of the cold detection threshold only after rTMS (p0.05). Qualitative assessment revealed only one study rated as “excellent/good” quality, while the other five were rated as “fair” or “poor”. Conclusion: Non-invasive brain stimulation may have a therapeutic effect on pain level for individuals with CPSP, as evidenced by significant decreases in clinical and experimental pain scores. However, despite the impact of CPSP and the promise of non-invasive brain stimulation, few rigorous studies have been performed in this area. Future studies should aim to standardize treatment parameters, measure both clinical and experimental pain, and include long-term follow-up.
机译:目的:中央后卒中疼痛(CPSP)是一种神经性疾病,导致疼痛和残疾。用于CPSP的新出现治疗是非侵入性脑刺激,包括直流刺激[TDCS]和重复的经颅磁刺激[RTMS]。该系统评论分析了CPSP非侵入性脑刺激干预研究的疗效和质量。方法:从2007年至2017年间发布的三个研究数据库寻求研究。如果唯一干预是非侵入性脑刺激,并且临床或实验性疼痛强度的主要结果包括研究。对偏倚风险进行定性评估研究。结果:提取1107篇文章,六所符合符合资格标准。五项研究发现疼痛强度降低(P <0.05)立即和RTMS或TDC在初级电机皮层上递送3周。对于实验性疼痛,一项研究发现与假(P <0.05)相比,接受TDC的那些研究发现热疼痛阈值(P <0.05),而另一个发现在RTMS之后发现冷检测阈值的正常化(P <0.05)。定性评估只有一项学习被评为“优秀/良好”的质量,而另外五个被评为“公平”或“穷人”。结论:无侵袭性脑刺激可能对具有CPSP的个体的疼痛水平具有治疗效果,如临床和实验性疼痛评分的显着降低所证明。然而,尽管CPSP的影响和非侵入性大脑刺激的承诺,但在这方面已经进行了很少的严格研究。未来的研究应该旨在标准化治疗参数,衡量临床和实验性疼痛,并包括长期随访。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号