...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pain and symptom management. >Were Clinical Routines for Good End-of-Life Care Maintained in Hospitals and Nursing Homes During the First Three Months of the Outbreak of COVID-19? A National Register Study
【24h】

Were Clinical Routines for Good End-of-Life Care Maintained in Hospitals and Nursing Homes During the First Three Months of the Outbreak of COVID-19? A National Register Study

机译:在Covid-19爆发的前三个月内,在医院和护理住宅中维护了良好的寿命保健的临床常规吗?国家注册学习

获取原文

摘要

Context Although the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic might affect important clinical routines, few studies have focused on the maintenance of good quality in end-of-life care. Objectives The objective was to examine whether adherence to clinical routines for good end-of-life care differed for deaths because of COVID-19 compared with a reference cohort from 2019 and whether they differed between nursing homes and hospitals. Methods Data about five items reflecting clinical routines for persons who died an expected death from COVID-19 during the first three months of the pandemic (March–May 2020) were collected from the Swedish Register of Palliative Care. The items were compared between the COVID-19 group and the reference cohort and between the nursing home and hospital COVID-19 deaths. Results About 1316 expected deaths were identified in nursing homes and 685 in hospitals. Four of the five items differed for total COVID-19 group compared with the reference cohort: fewer were examined by a physician during the last days before death, pain and oral health were less likely to be assessed, and fewer had a specialized palliative care team consultation ( P ?0.0001, respectively). Assessment of symptoms other than pain did not differ significantly. The five items differed between the nursing homes and hospitals in the COVID-19 group, most notably regarding the proportion of persons examined by a physician during the last days (nursing homes: 18%; hospitals: 100%). Conclusion This national register study shows that several clinical routines for end-of-life care did not meet the usual standards during the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden. Higher preparedness for and monitoring of end-of-life care quality should be integrated into future pandemic plans.
机译:背景信息虽然2019年冠状病毒疾病(Covid-19)大流行可能会影响重要的临床常规,但很少有研究专注于维护终身保健中的优质。目的是审查对良好的临床常规的临床常规,因为Covid-19与2019年的参考队列相比,死亡的良好终身保健差异不同,以及他们是否在疗养院和医院之间有所不同。方法从大流行病(3月2020年3月2020年3月20日)的瑞典姑息登记术中收集了关于从Covid-19中死亡的临床常规的五个项目的数据。这些项目在Covid-19组和参考队列之间以及养老院和医院Covid-19死亡之间进行了比较。结果养老院和685名医院中确定了约1316年的预期死亡。五个项目中的四个项目与总Covid-19组不同,与参考队列相比:在死亡前的最后几天,医生审查了更少的医生,疼痛和口腔健康不太可能被评估,并且较少有专门的姑息治疗咨询(分别为P <0.0001)。评估疼痛以外的症状并没有显着差异。在Covid-19集团的疗养院和医院之间的五个项目不同,最值得注意的是,关于医生在最后几天检查的人数(护理家庭:18%;医院:100%)。结论该国家注册研究表明,在瑞典Covid-19大流行的前三个月内,几种临床常规不符合通常的标准。应纳入未来的大流行计划的更高的准备和监测终生护理品质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号