首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ophthalmology >Comparison of the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Pediatric Eyes in Children of Different Ages
【24h】

Comparison of the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Pediatric Eyes in Children of Different Ages

机译:不同年龄儿童儿科眼睛的IOL功率计算公式的准确性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose. This study aims to compare the accuracy of five intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Haigis, and Holladay 2) for pediatric eyes in children of different ages. Methods. In this prospective study, patients who received cataract surgery and IOL implantation in the capsular bag were enrolled. We compared the calculation accuracy of 5 formulas at 1 month postoperatively and performed subgroup analysis with the patients divided into three groups according to their ages at the time of surgery as follows: group 1 (age?≤?2 years, 35 eyes), group 2 (2 years??age??5 years, 38 eyes), and group 3 (age??5 years, 29 eyes). Results. 75 patients (102 eyes) were enrolled in this study. The Haigis formula got the smallest PE among all formulas in all three groups. With regard to APE, there were no statistical differences among the formulas except group 2, with the SRK/T formula a little smaller, the Holladay 2 formula a little larger in group 1, and the Haigis formula a little smaller in group 3. In group 2, the Haigis formula had the lowest APE (0.87?±?0.61?D), while the Holladay 2 formula had the largest (1.71?±?1.20?D, p0.001), followed by the Holladay 1 formula (1.51?±?1.07?D, p=0.002). On comparing the percentage of APE within 0.5?D and 1.0?D obtained with 5 formulas in each group, there were no statistical differences. The SRK/T formula and the Holladay 1 formula showed the highest percentage (40.00% and 60.00%) in group 1. While the Haigis formula got the highest percentage in less than 0.5?D (34.21%) and less than 1?D (60.53%) in group 2. In group 3, the Holladay 2 formula and the Haigis formula got the highest percentage less than 0.5?D (58.62%) and less than 1?D (79.31%). The multiple linear regression indicated that the age at the time of surgery was a significant factor affecting the accuracy of APE; after removing the age, AL was the only factor that affected the accuracy of APE. Conclusion. The SRK/T and the Holladay 1 formulas were relatively accurate in patients younger than 2 years old, while the Haigis formula performed better in patients older than 2.
机译:目的。本研究旨在比较五个眼内透镜(IOL)功率计算公式(SRK / T,Hoffer Q,Holladay 1,Haigis和Holladay 2)对不同年龄的儿童的儿科眼的准确性。方法。在这项前瞻性研究中,注册了接受白内障手术和IOL植入囊袋的患者。我们将5个公式的计算精度与术后1个月的计算精度与患者分为三组,根据手术时的年龄如下,如下:第1组(年龄?≤?2年,35只眼睛),小组2(2年?<?年龄?<?5年,38只眼)和第3组(年龄?>?5年,29只眼睛)。结果。本研究报名参加75名患者(102只眼)。海吉公式在所有三组的所有公式中获得了最小的体育。关于APE,除第2组除外的公式中没有统计学差异,SRK / T配方略小,荷兰氏2配方在第1组中略大,第3组中的海里斯公式略小。第2组,海吉公式具有最低的猿(0.87?±0.61°D),而荷兰2配方具有最大(1.71?±1.20≤d,p <0.001),其次是荷兰1公式(1.51 ?±1.07?d,p = 0.002)。在每组中用5型配方中获得的0.5'D和1.0≤d的猿类百分比进行比较,没有统计差异。 SRK / T配方和霍洛拉接1型公式在1组中显示出最高百分比(40.00%和60.00%),而海吉公式的百分比少于0.5?D(34.21%)和小于1?D( 60.53%)在第2组中。在第3组中,Holladay 2公式和海格式的最高百分比小于0.5?D(58.62%)和小于1?D(79.31%)。多元线性回归表明手术时的年龄是影响猿精度的重要因素;在去除年龄后,AL是影响猿精度的唯一因素。结论。在2岁以下的患者中,SRK / T和Holladay 1配方均相对准确,而Haigis公式在2岁的患者中表现更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号