Correlations between clinical measures and symptoms: Report 1: Stereoacuity with accommodative, vergence measures, and symptoms

摘要

Aim The aim of this study was to explore associations between reduced stereoacuity and clinical measures of accommodation, vergences, and symptoms which could facilitate the development of quick and reliable screening tools. Methods Using a multi-stage random cluster sampling, 1211 high school students (481 males and 730 females) between 13 and 18 years of age, were selected and examined. Visual acuity, stereoacuity and suppression, refractive errors, near point of convergence, heterophoria and fusional vergences, as well as, amplitude of accommodation, accommodative response, facility and relative accommodation were evaluated. Correlations among variables and the validity of Randot stereoacuity to distinguish between children with and without defective clinical measures as well as symptomatic versus asymptomatic children were characterized by the sensitivity and specificity of the tests. Results The overall mean stereoacuity was 43.9?±?25.23?s arc, and 18.9% [95% Confidence Interval, 16.6?21.4%)] of the participants had reduced stereoacuity (defined as ≥60). Stereoacuity values and symptoms scores were worse in children with defective clinical measures. The Receiver Operation Curve showed that maximum sensitivity and specificity was obtained with near point of convergence break (≥10?cm) of (0.70 95% confidence interval: 0.63–0.77) with Randot stereoacuity test (defined as ≥60?s arc). The correlations between reduced stereoacuity and symptoms scores was moderately strong and statistically significant (Pearson’s, r?=?0.507, p?=?0.01). The Receiver Operation Curve showed that maximum sensitivity and specificity obtained with the Convergence Insufficiency Symptoms Survey was 0.57 (95% Confidence interval?=?0.53–0.62, p?=?0.001), sensitivity of 90.26%, and specificity 15.26% with the Randot stereoacuity test. Conclusion Reduced stereoacuity, defective clinical measures and symptoms of asthenopia were prevalent among sample of school children studied. Randot stereoacuity test could fairly distinguish between defective and normal clinical measures; though the accuracy to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic school children is poor. These findings highlight the need for validation of a simple and fast screening tool in school settings. Further studies to confirm above findings will be needed.