...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Natural Science Biology and Medicine >Vetrivel trauma score – An evidence-based scoring system to predict limb salvage and outcomes in gustilo anderson grade III B and C compound fractures of lower extremities
【24h】

Vetrivel trauma score – An evidence-based scoring system to predict limb salvage and outcomes in gustilo anderson grade III B and C compound fractures of lower extremities

机译:Vetrivel创伤得分 - 一种基于证据的评分系统,以预测甘蓝级和森群III B和下肢C复合骨折的肢体救生和结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Open fractures with severe soft-tissue injuries are clinically challenging to treat. While several scoring systems are available to grade these clinical conditions, the Gustilo Anderson grading system is most commonly used. This grading system neither offers any clue regarding salvaging open fractures of Grade III B and above, nor does it help the surgeon to assess the outcomes in such injuries. Hence, a new system of grading was assessed to address this deficiency. Materials and Methods: Five hundred and twelve open fracture cases were analyzed for this study. Two hundred and twenty-seven patients sustained Grade III injuries according to the Gustilo Anderson classification; Of these, 175 patients had Grade III A open fractures and 52 patients were of Grade III B and above. The 52 patients with open fractures of Grade III B and above were scored using mangled extremity severity score (MESS), Ganga score, and our novel scoring system. The accuracy in deciding amputation and predict outcomes were measured. Results: The scores assessed by the new scoring system were compared with MESS, Gustilo grading, and Ganga score system. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated our scoring system to be more accurate compared to all other scoring systems (P = 0.02). A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to compare all other scoring systems. The area under the curve (0.996 ± 0.003) for our scoring system was significantly higher with the less standard error of the mean than other scoring systems compared. Conclusions: Our new scoring system was more accurate in predicting limb salvage and outcomes compared to the existing scoring systems for open fractures of Grade III B and above.
机译:背景:具有严重软组织损伤的开放性骨折是临床上挑战治疗。虽然有几种评分系统可用于等级这些临床条件,但最常用的古斯特罗和龙群体分级系统。该分级系统既不提供有关救助III级B及以上的救助骨折的任何线索,也没有帮助外科医生评估这种伤害的结果。因此,评估了一种新的评分系统,以解决这种缺陷。材料和方法:对本研究分析了五百和12例开放性骨折病例。两百二十七名患者根据Gustilo Anderson分类持续III级伤害;其中,175名患者患有III级开放性骨折和52名患者是III级及以上。 52名患有III级和以上的开放性骨折的患者使用被疯狂的极端严重程度(混乱),甘达得分和我们的小说评分系统进行评分。测量决定截肢和预测结果的准确性。结果:新评分系统评估的分数与混乱,古斯图分级和甘达评分系统进行了比较。二进制物流回归分析表明,与所有其他评分系统相比,我们的评分系统更准确(P = 0.02)。接收器操作特性曲线被绘制以比较所有其他评分系统。对于我们得分系统的曲线下的区域(0.996±0.003),比较比其他评分系统的标准误差较少。结论:我们的新评分系统更准确地预测与现有裂缝的级别B及以上的开放骨折的分量系统相比的肢体救生和结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号