...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural Science >Impact of Zero Tillage and Tillage Practice in Chickpea Production
【24h】

Impact of Zero Tillage and Tillage Practice in Chickpea Production

机译:零耕作与耕作实践在鹰嘴豆生产中的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The study was carried out at the field of Regional Pulses Research Station, Madaripur under Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) during Rabi season (winter) to evaluate the effect of different tillage practices on growth, yield attributes, nutrient uptake and yield of chickpea, and to compare between the zero tillage and tillage practice.The experiment was planned with five different tillage practices viz.Zero tillage (T1), Single tillage (T2), Two tillage (T3), Three tillage (T4) and Four tillage (T5), and it was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications.Blanket dose of fertilizers of N, P, K, S, Zn and B at 20, 21, 30, 10, 3 and 1.5 kg ha-1, respectively were used in all tillage treatments.The highest mean seed yield achieved (1395 kg ha-1) in zero tillage (T1) followed by four tillage (T5) practice.The maximum number of branches plant-1 and more number of pods plant-1 was recorded in zero tillage treatment.Nutrient content showed non-significant effect across most of the treatment.The highest nodulation and nutrient (N, P, K and S) uptake was also obtained from T1 treatment.Tillage practices exhibited positive effects on soil properties.The highest soil organic carbon, total N, available P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Zn and B were found in zero tillage (T1).Based on profitability, the zero tillage was economically viable with compared to tillage practice.Although this practice (T1) saves the money about 3.8% to 13.7% and time also saves minimum 8 days for succeeding crops.So, the present study suggests that zero tillage practice could be implemented in the high and medium high land for chickpea cultivation.Low income farmers may practice the zero tillage technology.Future research should be carried out to evaluate the suitable rate of nutrient in zero tillage (conservative tillage) practice for yield maximization of chickpea and sustaining soil fertility.
机译:该研究是在孟加拉国农业研究所(Bari)的Madaripur区域脉冲研究站(Bari)的区域脉冲研究院(冬季)进行,评估不同耕作实践对鹰嘴豆的生长,产量属性,营养素摄取和产量的影响,并在零耕作和耕作实践之间进行比较。用五种不同的耕作实践进行实验,Ziz.zero耕作(T1),单耕种(T2),两种耕作(T3),三种耕作(T4)和四个耕作(T5 ),它以随机的完整块设计(RCBD)中定制,具有三种复制.B,P,K,S,Zn和B的Blanket剂量为20,21,30,10,3和1.5 kg HA -1分别用于所有耕作处理。零耕作(T1)中达到的最高平均种子产率(1395千克HA-1),然后进行了四个耕作(T5)实践。分支植物的最大数量和更多数字豆荚植物-1被记录在零耕作处理中。营养物质含量显示非大部分治疗中的显着效果。从T1治疗中也获得了最高的染色和营养素(N,P,K和S)吸收。滴注实践表现出对土壤性质的积极影响。最高土壤有机碳,总N,可用P.在零耕作(T1)中发现K,S,Ca,Mg,Zn和B.基于盈利能力,与耕作实践相比,零耕作与耕作实践相比,零耕作是经济上可行的。虽然这种做法(T1)将货币节省约3.8% 13.7%和时间也可节省至少8天的成功作物。所以本研究表明,零耕地可以在鹰嘴豆种植中的高中和中高地实施。利收入农民可以练习零耕作技术。应进行零耕作(保守耕作)实践的合适营养率,以获得鹰嘴豆的屈服最大化和维持土壤肥力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号