首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean medical science. >Intensivists' Direct Management without Residents May Improve the Survival Rate Compared to High-Intensity Intensivist Staffing in Academic Intensive Care Units: Retrospective and Crossover Study Design
【24h】

Intensivists' Direct Management without Residents May Improve the Survival Rate Compared to High-Intensity Intensivist Staffing in Academic Intensive Care Units: Retrospective and Crossover Study Design

机译:与居民的直接管理的直接管理可能会改善与学术重症监护单位的高强度强度人员配备的生存率:回顾性和交叉研究设计

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Medical staff members are concentrated in the intensive care unit (ICU), and medical residents are essentially needed to operate the ICU. However, the recent trend has been to restrict resident working hours. This restriction may lead to a shortage of ICU staff, and there is a chance that regional academic hospitals will face running ICUs without residents in the near future. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study (intensivist crossover design) of medical patients who were transferred to two ICUs from general wards between September 2017 and February 2019 at one academic hospital. We compared the ICU outcomes according to the ICU type (ICU with resident management under high-intensity intensivist staffing vs. ICU with direct management by intensivists without residents). Results Of 314 enrolled patients, 70 were primarily managed by residents, and 244 were directly managed by intensivists. The latter patients showed better ICU mortality (29.9% vs. 42.9%, P = 0.042), lower cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (10.2% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.013), lower continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (24.2% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.009), and more advanced care planning decisions before death (87.3% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.013) than the former patients. The better ICU mortality (hazard ratio, 1.641; P = 0.035), lower CPR (odds ratio [OR], 2.891; P = 0.009), lower CRRT (OR, 2.602; P = 0.005), and more advanced care planning decisions before death (OR, 4.978; P = 0.007) were also associated with intensivist direct management in the multivariate cox and logistic regression analysis. Conclusion Intensivist direct management might be associated with better ICU outcomes than resident management under the supervision of an intensivist. Further large-scale prospective randomized trials are required to draw a definitive conclusion.
机译:背景医务人员集中在重症监护室(ICU)中,而且实际上需要医疗居民才能运营ICU。然而,最近的趋势是限制居民工作时间。这种限制可能导致ICU工作人员的短缺,并且有可能在不久的将来没有居民的情况将面临森林危险。方法采用2017年9月至2019年2月至2019年2月在一所学术医院转移到来自普通病房的医疗患者的回顾性观测研究(强硬杂交跨界设计)。我们将根据ICU类型的ICU结果进行比较(ICU,高强度强度居民管理人员与ICU为常规管理,并通过无居民的强烈管理员直接管理)。结果314名患者,70岁主要由居民管理,244人被强康师直接管理。后一种患者表现出更好的ICU死亡率(29.9%vs.2.9%,P = 0.042),较低的心肺复苏(CPR)(10.2%vs.21.4%,P = 0.013),较低的连续肾置换疗法(CRRT)(24.2%比前患者死亡前40.0%,P = 0.009),更先进的护理计划决定(87.3%,P = 0.013)。更好的ICU死亡率(危险比,1.641; p = 0.035),降低CPR(差距[或],2.891; P = 0.009),下CRRT(或2.602; P = 0.005),以及之前更先进的护理计划决策死亡(或4.978; p = 0.007)也与多元Cox和逻辑回归分析中的强度直接管理有关。结论在监督强度的监督下,强度直接管理可能与居民管理更好的ICU结果。需要进一步的大规模预期随机试验来吸引明确的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号