...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental and Public Health >Overview of “Systematic Reviews” of the Built Environment’s Effects on Mental Health
【24h】

Overview of “Systematic Reviews” of the Built Environment’s Effects on Mental Health

机译:建筑环境对心理健康影响的“系统评论”概述

获取原文
           

摘要

Good mental health is related to mental and psychological well-being, and there is growing interest in the potential role of the built environment on mental health, yet the evidence base underpinning the direct or indirect effects of the built environment is not fully clear. The aim of this overview is to assess the effect of the built environment on mental health-related outcomes. Methods. This study provides an overview of published systematic reviews (SRs) that assess the effect of the built environment on mental health. We reported the overview according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases searched until November 2019 included the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE (OVID 1946 to present), LILACS, and PsycINFO. Two authors independently selected reviews, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using the Assessing Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2). Results. In total, 357 records were identified from a structured search of five databases combined with the references of the included studies, and eleven SRs were included in the narrative synthesis. Outcomes included mental health and well-being, depression and stress, and psychological distress. According to AMSTAR-2 scores, the quality assessment of the included SRs was categorized as “high” in two SRs and as “critically low” in nine SRs. According to the conclusions of the SRs reported by the authors, only one SR reported a “beneficial” effect on mental health and well-being outcomes. Conclusion. There was insufficient evidence to make firm conclusions on the effects of built environment interventions on mental health outcomes (well-being, depression and stress, and psychological distress). The evidence collected reported high heterogeneity (outcomes and measures) and a moderate- to low-quality assessment among the included SRs.
机译:良好的心理健康与心理和心理健康有关,对建筑环境对心理健康的潜在作用越来越感兴趣,但基础的基础是建造环境的直接或间接影响并不完全清楚。该概述的目的是评估建筑环境对与心理健康相关结果的影响。方法。本研究概述了已发布的系统评论(SRS),可评估建筑环境对心理健康的影响。我们报告了概述根据首选报告项目,用于系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指导方针。数据库搜索到2019年11月,包括系统评论,Embase,Medline(Ovid 1946至展示),丁香和Psycinfo的Cochrane数据库。两位作者独立选择的评估,提取数据,并评估了使用评估的系统性评论-2(AMSTAR-2)的方法学质量的含有审查的方法论质量。结果。总共有357条记录从五个数据库的结构搜索中确定,结合所附研究的参考文献,而11个SRS包含在叙事合成中。结果包括精神健康和福祉,抑郁和压力,心理困扰。根据AMSTAR-2分数,所附SRS的质量评估被分为两个SRS中的“高”,九个SRS中的“危重低”。根据作者报告的SRS的结论,只有一个SR报告了对心理健康和幸福成果的“有益的”影响。结论。没有足够的证据可以结论建立环境干预对心理健康结果(福祉,抑郁和压力和心理窘迫)的影响。收集的证据报告报告了高异质性(结果和措施)以及包括的SRS中的中等至低质量的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号